Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik

被引:631
作者
Follesdal, Andreas
Hix, Simon
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Giandomenico Majone and Andrew Moravcsik have argued that the EU does not suffer a 'democratic deficit'. We disagree about one key element: whether a democratic polity requires contestation for political leadership and over policy. This aspect is an essential element of even the 'thinnest' theories of democracy, yet is conspicuously absent in the EU.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 562
页数:30
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN S, 1996, EUROPEAN UNION HOW D
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EUROPEAN LAW J
[3]  
[Anonymous], LINKING NATL POLITIC
[4]  
[Anonymous], POLITICAL THEORY EUR
[5]  
[Anonymous], POLITICAL THEORY EUR
[6]  
BARRY B, 1991, DEMOCRACY SPECIAL DE
[7]   A THEORY OF COMPETITION AMONG PRESSURE GROUPS FOR POLITICAL INFLUENCE [J].
BECKER, GS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (03) :371-400
[8]  
Beetham D.Lord., 1998, LEGITIMACY EUROPEAN
[9]  
Beitz Charles., 1989, Political Equality
[10]  
Blondel Jean., 1998, People and Parliament in the European Union