Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework

被引:178
作者
Boschma, Ron [1 ,2 ]
Capone, Gianluca [3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, CIRCLE, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Utrecht, URU, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] IUSS, Inst Adv Studies, Pavia, Italy
关键词
Varieties of capitalism; Institutions; Relatedness; Diversification; Evolutionary economic geography; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; INNOVATION; GROWTH; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS; ENTRY; HALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The varieties of capitalism literature has drawn little attention to industrial renewal and diversification, while the related diversification literature has neglected the institutional dimension of industrial change. Bringing together both literatures, the paper proposes that institutions have an impact on the direction of the diversification process, in particular on whether countries gain a comparative advantage in new sectors that are close or far from what is already part of their existing industrial structure. We investigate the diversification process in 23 developed countries by means of detailed product trade data in the period 1995-2010. Our results show that relatedness is a stronger driver of diversification into new products in coordinated market economies, while liberal market economies show a higher probability to move in more unrelated industries: their overarching institutional framework gives countries more freedom to make a jump in their industrial evolution. In particular, we found that the role of relatedness as driver of diversification into new sectors is stronger in the presence of institutions that focus more on 'non-market' coordination in the domains of labor relations, corporate governance relations, product market relations, and inter-firm relations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1902 / 1914
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
ABERNATHY WJ, 1978, TECHNOL REV, V80, P40
[2]  
Acemoglu D., 2014, 14004 PIER
[3]   Do 'liberal market economies' really innovate more radically than 'coordinated market economies'? Hall and Soskice reconsidered [J].
Akkermans, Dirk ;
Castaldi, Carolina ;
Los, Bart .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :181-191
[4]  
Allen M., 2006, Journal of Public Policy, V26, P1
[5]   Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production [J].
Amable, B .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 7 (04) :645-687
[6]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Working Paper 146
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CONTINUITY I CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199280452.003.0001
[9]  
Asheim BjornT., 2005, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V31, n.o, P163, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-5028-0
[10]   TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALASSA, B .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02) :99-123