Weed Science Research and Funding: A Call to Action

被引:26
作者
Davis, Adam S. [1 ]
Hall, J. Christopher [2 ]
Jasieniuk, Marie [3 ]
Locke, Martin A. [4 ]
Luschei, Edward C. [5 ]
Mortensen, David A. [6 ]
Riechers, Dean E. [7 ]
Smith, Richard G. [6 ]
Sterling, Tracy M. [8 ]
Westwood, James H. [9 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Invas Weed Management Unit, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Environm Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Vegetable Crops, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] USDA ARS, Water Qual & Ecol Res Unit, Oxford, MS 38655 USA
[5] Dept Agron, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[7] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[8] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Entomol Plant Pathol & Weed Sci, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[9] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol Physiol & Weed Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY; SYSTEMS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1614/WS-09-020.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy resting and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the Survey, a response rate of 23%. The largest group of respondents (41%) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22%) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups of scientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 448
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Booth BD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P2, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0002:AIATAT]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Buhler DD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P273, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0273:AIAAOF]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework [J].
Catford, Jane A. ;
Jansson, Roland ;
Nilsson, Christer .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2009, 15 (01) :22-40
[6]  
Hall JC, 2000, WEED TECHNOL, V14, P647, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0647:FRDFWS]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Liebman M, 2000, WEED RES, V40, P27, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x
[9]  
Liebman Matt, 1993, Ecol Appl, V3, P39, DOI 10.2307/1941790
[10]   Coevolution of agricultural systems and their weed companions:: implications for research [J].
Martínez-Ghersa, MA ;
Ghersa, CM ;
Satorre, EH .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2000, 67 (02) :181-190