Pleasure, politics, and the "public interest" - Melbourne's riverscape revitalization

被引:60
作者
Sandercock, L [1 ]
Dovey, K
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Community & Reg Planning, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01944360208976262
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
As global Forces have reshaped urban landscapes over the past 2 decades, cities have typically responded with a range of "spectacular" developments, the most common of which have been waterfront projects, In this article we describe the transformation of Melbourne's urban riverscape from an industrial junkyard into a postindustrial "landscape of desire." A primary concern is identifying winners and losers in this restructuring, To this end, we resurrect and redefine the concept of the public interest. In Melbourne, the production of signature projects geared to global place marketing coincided with a collapse of democratic public planning. Urban development became design driven, more seductive, and more secretive. Urban planning practice was restructured along with the urban landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 164
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ALBERS R, 2000, INVENTING LOCAL DEMO
[2]  
Allmendinger P., 1997, Planning Practice and Research, V12, P147, DOI [10.1080/02697459716617, DOI 10.1080/02697459716617]
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLANNING BETTER FUTU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, URBAN POLICY RES, DOI DOI 10.1080/08111140008727852
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, GLOBAL FINANCE URBAN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SYDNEY EMERGENCE WOR
[7]  
[Anonymous], SYDNEY EMERGENCE WOR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FANTASY CITY PLEASUR
[9]  
[Anonymous], SYDNEY EMERGENCE WOR
[10]  
[Anonymous], CITY CAPITAL WATER