Validation of a low-cost, liquid-based screening method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:12
作者
Lee, Judy M.
Kelly, Deidra
Gravitt, Patti E.
Fansler, Zoya
Maksem, John A.
Clark, Douglas P.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Div Gynecol Specialties, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Div Cytopathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Bostwick Labs, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
low cost; liquid-based cytology; cervical cancer screening;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: The objective of the study was to validate a low-cost, liquid-based method for cervical cancer screening. Study design: We conducted a retrospective, split-sample comparison of 300 liquid-based cervical cytology samples from a group of 150 human immunodeficiency virus-scropositive women and 150 women from low-risk general gynecology clinics whose specimens were screened via standard liquid-based methodology as part of routine care. Residual samples from each specimen were used to prepare a slide using a novel, inexpensive manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology. These slides were screened by a cytotechnologist and abnormal cases were reviewed by a pathologist. Final diagnoses from the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology slides were compared with the original diagnoses and available cervical biopsy data. Results: There was good overall agreement between the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology and original cytology diagnoses (76.3% agreement; kappa = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.59). Using available biopsy data to determine the accuracy of each method to identify high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology method was found to have a higher sensitivity (71.4% versus 57.1%) and lower specificity (82.1% versus 89.7%). The slightly higher referral rate to colposcopy using the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology method was limited to women from the low-risk general gynecology clinics (16.7% versus 12.0%, P = .05). Conclusion: The low-cost manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology cervical cytology method is comparable with a standard commercial method. Consequently, it may be of value in alternative screening strategies in resource-limited settings. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 970
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey [J].
Abulafia, O ;
Pezzullo, JC ;
Sherer, DM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) :137-144
[2]
Conventional and liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A comparison study with clinical and histologic follow-up [J].
Baker, JJ .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 27 (03) :185-188
[3]
Carpenter AB, 1999, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V87, P105, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990625)87:3<105::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
[4]
2-Z
[5]
Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries [J].
Goldie, SJ ;
Gaffikin, L ;
Goldhaber-Fiebert, JD ;
Gordillo-Tobar, A ;
Levin, C ;
Mahé, C ;
Wright, TC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (20) :2158-2168
[6]
Hutchinson ML, 1999, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V87, P48, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990425)87:2&lt
[7]
48::AID-CNCR2&gt
[8]
3.0.CO
[9]
2-D
[10]
Johnson T, 2000, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V22, P86, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(200002)22:2<86::AID-DC5>3.0.CO