Real-time data assimilation for operational ensemble streamflow forecasting

被引:139
作者
Vrugt, Jasper A.
Gupta, Hoshin V.
Nuallain, Breanndan O.
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Div Earth & Environm Sci, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Computat Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Phys Geog & Soil Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JHM504.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Operational flood forecasting requires that accurate estimates of the uncertainty associated with model-generated streamflow forecasts be provided along with the probable flow levels. This paper demonstrates a stochastic ensemble implementation of the Sacramento model used routinely by the National Weather Service for deterministic streamflow forecasting. The approach, the simultaneous optimization and data assimilation method ( SODA), uses an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for recursive state estimation allowing for treatment of streamflow data error, model structural error, and parameter uncertainty, while enabling implementation of the Sacramento model without major modification to its current structural form. Model parameters are estimated in batch using the shuffled complex evolution metropolis stochastic-ensemble optimization approach (SCEM-UA). The SODA approach was implemented using parallel computing to handle the increased computational requirements. Studies using data from the Leaf River, Mississippi, indicate that forecast performance improvements on the order of 30% to 50% can be realized even with a suboptimal implementation of the filter. Further, the SODA parameter estimates appear to be less biased, which may increase the prospects for finding useful regionalization relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 565
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Anderson JL, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P2884, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2884:AEAKFF>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
[Anonymous], MODEL VALIDATION PER
[4]   A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking [J].
Arulampalam, MS ;
Maskell, S ;
Gordon, N ;
Clapp, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 50 (02) :174-188
[5]   ADAPTIVE PARAMETER-ESTIMATION FOR MULTISITE HYDROLOGIC FORECASTING [J].
AWWAD, HM ;
VALDES, JB .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (09) :1201-1221
[6]   STREAMFLOW FORECASTING FOR HAN RIVER BASIN, KOREA [J].
AWWAD, HM ;
VALDES, JB ;
RESTREPO, PJ .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1994, 120 (05) :651-673
[7]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[8]  
Box GE., 2011, BAYESIAN INFERENCE S
[9]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[10]   Toward improved streamflow forecasts: Value of semidistributed modeling [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S ;
Koren, V ;
Zhang, ZY ;
Smith, M .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (11) :2749-2759