Combining Web-Based and Mail Surveys Improves Response Rates: A PBRN Study From PRIME Net

被引:43
作者
Kroth, Philip J. [1 ]
McPherson, Laurie
Leverence, Robert
Pace, Wilson [2 ]
Daniels, Elvan [3 ]
Rhyne, Robert L.
Williams, Robert L.
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Informat Program, Dev Hlth Sci Lib, Hlth Sci Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[3] Morehouse Sch Med, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Data collection; paper; questionnaires; attitude of health personnel; attitude to computers; electronic mail; time factors; user-computer interface; computer communication networks; health Surveys; postal service; health care surveys/methods; ELECTRONIC MAIL; POSTAL SURVEYS; PHYSICIANS; INTERNET; TRIAL; FAX;
D O I
10.1370/afm.944
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
PURPOSE The advent of Web-based survey tools has provided the investigator with an alternative to paper-based survey methods that in many instances may be less expensive to implement than traditional paper-based surveys. Newer technology, however, does not diminish the importance of obtaining an adequate response rate. METHODS We analyzed response rate data obtained from a survey implemented across 3 practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in which the survey was first implemented electronically with 5 rounds of electronic solicitation for an Internet-based questionnaire and then by 2 rounds of a paper-based version mailed only to nonresponders. RESULTS Overall, 24% of the total survey responses received were in the paper mode despite intense promotion of the survey in the electronic phase, CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest there is still an important role for the use of paper-based methods in PBRN survey research. Both hard copy and electronic survey collection methods may be required to enhance clinician response rates in PBRNs. Ann Fam Med 2009:7:245-248. DOI: 10.1370/afm.944.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 248
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty [J].
Akl, EA ;
Maroun, N ;
Klocke, RA ;
Montori, V ;
Schünemann, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (04) :425-429
[2]
Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians [J].
Beebe, Timothy J. ;
Locke, G. Richard, III ;
Barnes, Sunni A. ;
Davern, Michael E. ;
Anderson, Kari J. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (03) :1219-1234
[3]
Cobanoglu C, 2001, INT J MARKET RES, V43, P441
[4]
Dillman, 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE, V19
[5]
Griffis StanelyE., 2003, J BUS LOGIST, V24, P237, DOI 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00053.x
[6]
KROTH PJ, 2008, PRIME NET HEPATITIS
[7]
Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys - The tortoise and the hare revisited [J].
Mavis, BE ;
Brocato, JJ .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1998, 21 (03) :395-408
[8]
Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians [J].
McMahon, SR ;
Iwamoto, M ;
Massoudi, MS ;
Yusuf, HR ;
Stevenson, JM ;
David, F ;
Chu, SY ;
Pickering, LK .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (04) :e299-303
[9]
E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs [J].
Raziano, DB ;
Jayadevappa, R ;
Valenzula, D ;
Weiner, M ;
Lavizzo-Mourey, R .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (06) :799-804
[10]
Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians - A randomized trial of mail Internet and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys [J].
Rodriguez, HP ;
von Glahn, T ;
Rogers, WH ;
Chang, H ;
Fanjiang, G ;
Safran, DG .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (02) :167-174