Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

被引:498
作者
Petersen, Laura A.
Woodard, LeChauncy D.
Urech, Tracy
Daw, Christina
Sookanan, Supicha
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Hlth Serv Res & Dev 152, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Most physicians and hospitals are paid the same regardless of the quality of the health care they provide. This produces no financial incentives and, in some cases, produces disincentives for quality. Increasing numbers of programs link payment to performance. Purpose: To systematically review studies assessing the effect of explicit financial incentives for improved performance on measures of health care quality. Data Sources: PubMed search of English-language literature (1 January 1980 to 14 November 2005), and reference lists of retrieved articles. Study Selection: Empirical studies of the relationship between explicit financial incentives designed to improve health care quality and a quantitative measure of health care quality. Data Extraction: The authors categorized studies according to the level of the incentive (individual physician, provider group, or health care payment system) and the type of quality measure rewarded. Data Synthesis: Thirteen of 17 studies examined process-of-care quality measures, most of which were for preventive services. Five of the 6 studies of physician-level financial incentives and 7 of the 9 studies of provider group-level financial incentives found partial or positive effects on measures of quality. One of the 2 studies of incentives at the payment-system level found a positive effect on access to care, and 1 showed evidence of a negative effect on access to care for the sickest patients. In all, 4 studies suggested unintended effects of incentives. The authors found no studies examining the optimal duration of financial incentives for quality or the persistence of their effects after termination. Only 1 study addressed cost-effectiveness. Limitations: Few empirical studies of explicit financial incentives for quality were available for review. Conclusions: Ongoing monitoring of incentive programs is critical to determine the effectiveness of financial incentives and their possible unintended effects on quality of care. Further research is needed to guide implementation of financial incentives and to assess their cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Abelson Reed, 2003, N Y Times Web, P18
[2]  
Agency Healthc. Res. Quality (AHRQ), NAT QUAL MEAS CLEAR
[3]  
Amundson Gail, 2003, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, V29, P59
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MEDICARE STRATEGY QU
[5]  
Armour BS, 2004, AM J MANAG CARE, V10, P617
[6]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[7]   Putting smart money to work for quality improvement [J].
Beaulieu, ND ;
Horrigan, DR .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (05) :1318-1334
[8]   Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? [J].
Berlin, JA .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9072) :185-186
[9]   Paying for performance: Medicare should lead [J].
Berwick, DM ;
DeParle, NA ;
Eddy, DM ;
Ellwood, PM ;
Enthoven, AC ;
Halvorson, GC ;
Kizer, KW ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Reinhardt, UE ;
Reischauer, RD ;
Roper, WL ;
Rowe, JW ;
Schaeffer, LD ;
Wennberg, JE ;
Wilensky, GR .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (06) :8-10
[10]   THE DOCTOR AS DOUBLE AGENT - INFORMATION ASYMMETRY, HEALTH-INSURANCE, AND MEDICAL-CARE [J].
BLOMQVIST, A .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1991, 10 (04) :411-432