What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zealand

被引:40
作者
Aerni, Philipp [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, World Trade Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Environm Decis, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sustainable agriculture; Agricultural biotechnology; Stakeholder attitudes; New Zealand; Switzerland; STAKEHOLDER ATTITUDES; MEXICO; RISKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Public debates on sustainable agriculture tend to be shaped by dominant political stakeholders with a particular political agenda. They simultaneously contribute and respond to the formation of public opinion. In this paper, we investigate to what extent stakeholder attitudes and interests help explain national conceptions of sustainable agriculture and how these conceptions diverge between countries with different agricultural policies. For that purpose, we conducted two stakeholder perception surveys in Switzerland and New Zealand. The data analysis revealed that there are significant differences in perception between the two countries. While Swiss respondents felt that Swiss agriculture is already quite sustainable and that international trade and new technologies are likely to render it less sustainable, New Zealand respondents generally thought that economic and technological change is necessary to make agriculture more sustainable. The conservative Swiss attitude is in accordance with the country's defensive agricultural policy while the more progressive New Zealand attitude is clearly linked to its need to reconcile agricultural sustainability with national competitiveness. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1872 / 1882
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Aerni P., 2007, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, V6, P429, DOI 10.1504/IJARGE.2007.013513
[2]   Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa: The issue of public trust [J].
Aerni, P ;
Bernauer, T .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (03) :557-575
[3]   Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines [J].
Aerni, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (06) :1123-1137
[4]   Biplots of compositional data [J].
Aitchison, J ;
Greenacre, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2002, 51 :375-392
[5]  
Althaus ScottL., 2004, COLLECTIVE PREFERENC
[6]  
Altieri M. A., 2018, Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO IS RATIONAL STUD
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1981, INTERPRETING MULTIVA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HEURISTICS BIASES PS
[10]  
Ansell Christopher., 2006, WHATS BEEF CONTESTED