A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:69
作者
Hollington, P [1 ]
Toogood, GJ [1 ]
Padbury, RTA [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 1999年 / 69卷 / 12期
关键词
ambulatory surgery; cost-effectiveness; laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
D O I
10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01713.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed as day surgery has been established, cost and recovery time have not previously been evaluated in a prospective comparative fashion. Methods: Patients were randomized to day stay only or overnight stay, and a nurse assessed the former postoperatively at home. All patients were reviewed weekly or as required if problems occurred. Costing comparisons were made between the two groups using Trendstar software. Results: A total of 131 patients were evaluated after randomization (60 day-stay only patients and 71 overnight-stay patients). A total of 18.3% of the day-stay patients required in-hospital admission for nausea, vomiting, or pain, or after conversion to open operation; 18.3% of the overnight group required an extended length of stay for similar reasons. After discharge, two day-stay and three overnight-stay patients required readmission, only one had a significant complication. The mean times to return to normal activity averaged 1.8 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) and 1.9 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) for day-stay and overnight-stay groups, respectively (P = 0.63), and costs of $2732 (SE: $76) compared to $2835 (SE $110), respectively (P = 0.94). Conclusions: In the present randomized controlled study, day-stay management did not compromise postoperative patient outcome. In the setting of a major teaching hospital there was no cost advantage when compared to overnight-stay management.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 843
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN A FREESTANDING OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER
    FARHA, GJ
    GREEN, BP
    BEAMER, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 1994, 4 (05): : 291 - 294
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    FIELDING, GA
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 62 (03): : 181 - 187
  • [3] AN EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    HARDY, KJ
    MILLER, H
    FLETCHER, DR
    JONES, RM
    SHULKES, A
    MCNEIL, JJ
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1994, 160 (02) : 58 - 62
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINILAPAROTOMY CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    MCMAHON, AJ
    RUSSELL, IT
    BAXTER, JN
    ROSS, S
    ANDERSON, JR
    MORRAN, CG
    SUNDERLAND, G
    GALLOWAY, D
    RAMSAY, G
    ODWYER, PJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 343 (8890) : 135 - 138
  • [5] MEYERS WC, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V324, P1073
  • [6] Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Mjaland, O
    Raeder, J
    Aasboe, V
    Trondsen, E
    Buanes, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (07) : 958 - 961
  • [7] Singleton RJ, 1996, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V24, P231
  • [8] TRONDSEN E, 1993, EUR J SURG, V159, P217
  • [9] Is outpatient cholecystectomy safe for the higher-risk elective patient?
    Voitk, AJ
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (12): : 1147 - 1149
  • [10] Selection criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory care setting
    Voyles, CR
    Berch, BR
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (12): : 1145 - 1146