Seeking Health Information Online: Does Wikipedia Matter?

被引:190
作者
Laurent, Michael R. [1 ]
Vickers, Tim J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Mol Microbiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
COMMUNITY ANNOTATION; INTERNET; WIKI; DATABASE; ACCURACY; MEDICINE; SEARCHES;
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M3059
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the significance of the English Wikipedia as a source of online health information. Design: The authors measured Wikipedia's ranking on general Internet search engines by entering keywords from MedlinePlus, NHS Direct Online, and the National Organization of Rare Diseases as queries into search engine optimization software. We assessed whether article quality influenced this ranking. The authors tested whether traffic to Wikipedia coincided with epidemiological trends and news of emerging health concerns, and how it compares to MedlinePlus. Measurements: Cumulative incidence and average position of Wikipedia (R) compared to other Web sites among the first 20 results on general Internet search engines (Google (R), Google UK (R), Yahoo (R), and MSN (R)), and page view statistics for selected Wikipedia articles and MedlinePlus pages. Results: Wikipedia ranked among the first ten results in 71-85% of search engines and keywords tested. Wikipedia Surpassed MedlinePlus and NHS Direct Online (except for queries from the latter on Google UK), and ranked higher with quality articles. Wikipedia ranked highest for rare diseases, although its incidence in several categories decreased. Page views increased parallel to the occurrence of 20 seasonal disorders and news of three emerging health concerns. Wikipedia articles were viewed more often than MedlinePlus Topic (p = 0.001) but for MedlinePlus Encyclopedia pages, the trend was not significant (p = 0.07-0.10). Conclusions: Based on its search engine ranking and page view statistics, the English Wikipedia is a prominent Source of online health information compared to the other online health information providers studied.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 479
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Agha Riaz, 2006, Int J Surg, V4, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.002
[2]  
*AL, TOP 500 SIT
[3]  
Altmann U, 2005, ST HEAL T, V116, P755
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Nature, V438, P890
[5]   Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information - Results from a national survey [J].
Baker, L ;
Wagner, TH ;
Singer, S ;
Bundorf, MK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (18) :2400-2406
[6]  
Bidartondo MI, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P1616, DOI 10.1126/science.319.5870.1616a
[7]   Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia [J].
Clauson, Kevin A. ;
Polen, Hyla H. ;
Boulos, Maged N. Kamel ;
Dzenowagis, Joan H. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 42 (12) :1814-1821
[8]   Cancer Internet search activity on a major search engine, United States 2001-2003 [J].
Cooper, CP ;
Mallon, KP ;
Leadbetter, S ;
Pollack, LA ;
Peipins, LA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (03)
[9]  
Crespo Richard, 2007, Prev Chronic Dis, V4, pA75
[10]   Transdab wiki: the interactive transglutaminase substrate database on web 2.0 surface [J].
Csosz, Eva ;
Mesko, Bertalan ;
Fesus, Laszlo .
AMINO ACIDS, 2009, 36 (04) :615-617