Safety and Efficacy of Rapid Titration Using 1mg Doses of Intravenous Hydromorphone in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Severe Pain: The "1+1" Protocol

被引:23
作者
Chang, Andrew K. [1 ]
Bijur, Polly E. [1 ]
Campbell, Caron M. [1 ]
Murphy, Mary K. [1 ]
Gallagher, E. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
MORPHINE; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pain protocol using 1 mg intravenous (IV) hydromorphone followed by an optional dose of 1 mg IV hydromorphone 15 minutes later. Methods: Prospective interventional study at an urban academic emergency department (ED). One milligram of IV hydromorphone was administered to adults 21 to 64 years of age who had acute severe pain. Fifteen minutes later, patients were asked whether they wanted more pain medication. If they answered yes, they received another 1 mg of IV hydromorphone and were again asked 15 minutes later whether they wanted more pain medication. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who had adequate analgesia, defined as declining additional hydromorphone within 1 hour of entering the protocol. The primary safety outcome was incidence of oxygen desaturation less than 95%. Secondary outcomes included numeric rating scale pain scores and adverse events. Results: Of the 223 patients with complete data, 1 mg IV hydromorphone provided adequate analgesia for 77% (95% confidence interval 71% to 82%) within 15 minutes and 96% (95% confidence interval 92% to 98%) within 1 hour of entering the protocol. Eighty-six percent of patients reported pain scores that decreased by 2 or more numeric rating scale units. Five percent experienced transient oxygen desaturation below 95%, which was corrected promptly with oxygen. Conclusion: A rapid titration protocol using IV hydromorphone (1 mg hydromorphone followed by an optional 1 mg 15 minutes later) is efficacious in nonelderly ED patients with acute severe pain. There were no serious adverse events. [Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:221-225.]
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 225
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Chang AK, 2008, ACAD EMERG MED, V15, pS56
[2]  
Chang AK, 2006, ANN EMERG MED, V48, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.005
[3]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[4]  
Fry Margaret, 2002, Emerg Med (Fremantle), V14, P249, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00339.x
[5]  
Kelly Anne-Maree, 2005, CJEM, V7, P149
[6]   Intravenous morphine titration to treat severe pain in the ED [J].
Lvovschi, Virginie ;
Aubrun, Frederic ;
Bonnet, Pascale ;
Bouchara, Anna ;
Bendahou, Mouhssine ;
Humbert, Beatrice ;
Hausfater, Pierre ;
Riou, Bruno .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 26 (06) :676-682
[7]   Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine [J].
Rupp, T ;
Delaney, KA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 43 (04) :494-503
[8]   Intravenous fentanyl for cancer pain: A "fast titration" protocol for the emergency room [J].
Soares, LGL ;
Martins, M ;
Uchoa, R .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 26 (03) :876-881
[9]   Undertreatment of acute pain in the emergency department: a challenge [J].
Stalnikowicz, R ;
Mahamid, R ;
Kaspi, S ;
Brezis, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (02) :173-176
[10]   Pain in the emergency department: Results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study [J].
Todd, Knox H. ;
Ducharme, James ;
Choiniere, Manon ;
Crandall, Cameron S. ;
Fosnocht, David E. ;
Homel, Peter ;
Tanabe, Paula .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 8 (06) :460-466