On the Limits of the Precautionary Principle

被引:25
作者
Stefansson, H. Orri [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Inst Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Catastrophic risk; environmental policy; precautionary principle; TERJE AVENS; UNCERTAINTIES; SUGGESTIONS; GROUNDS;
D O I
10.1111/risa.13265
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The precautionary principle (PP) is an influential principle of risk management. It has been widely introduced into environmental legislation, and it plays an important role in most international environmental agreements. Yet, there is little consensus on precisely how to understand and formulate the principle. In this article I prove some impossibility results for two plausible formulations of the PP as a decision-rule. These results illustrate the difficulty in making the PP consistent with the acceptance of any tradeoffs between catastrophic risks and more ordinary goods. How one interprets these results will, however, depend on one's views and commitments. For instance, those who are convinced that the conditions in the impossibility results are requirements of rationality may see these results as undermining the rationality of the PP. But others may simply take these results to identify a set of purported rationality conditions that defenders of the PP should not accept, or to illustrate types of situations in which the principle should not be applied.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1222
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Foundations of Measurement I: Additive and Polynomial Representations
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1954, The Foundations of Statistics
[3]  
Arrow K. J., 1977, STUDIES RESOURCES AL, P463
[4]  
Aven T., 2010, Misconceptions of Risk
[5]   How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Reniers, Genserik .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (01) :223-231
[6]   Straightening Out the Grounds for Precaution: A Commentary and Some Suggestions About Terje Aven's "On Different Types of Uncertainties" Response [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (10) :1538-1542
[7]   On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (10) :1515-1525
[8]   The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson [J].
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) :2039-2040
[9]   Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent? [J].
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (11) :2026-2034
[10]  
Broome John., 1991, Weighing Goods