Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA

被引:239
作者
Knutson, MG
Sauer, JR
Olsen, DA
Mossman, MJ
Hemesath, LM
Lannoo, MJ
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Environm Sci Ctr, La Crosse, WI 54603 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] Bur Integrated Sci Serv, Dept Nat Resources, Monona, WI 53716 USA
[4] Nongame Program, Dept Nat Resources, Boone, IA 50036 USA
[5] Ball State Univ, Indiana Sch Med, Muncie Ctr Med Educ, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Management of amphibian populations to reverse recent declines will require defining high-quality habitat for individual species or groups of species, followed by efforts to retain or restore these habitats on the landscape. We examined landscape-level habitat relationships for frogs and toads by measuring associations between relative abundance and species richness based on survey data derived from anuran calls and features of land-cover maps for Iowa and Wisconsin. The most consistent result across all anuran guilds was a negative association with the presence of urban land. Upland and wetland forests and emergent wetlands tended to be positively associated with anurans. Landscape metrics that represent edges and patch diversity also had generally positive associations, indicating that anurans benefit from a complex of habitats that include wetlands. In Iowa the most significant associations with relative abundance were the length of the edge between wetland and forest (positive) and the presence of urban land (negative). In Wisconsin the two most significant associations with relative abundance were forest area and agricultural area (both positive). Anurans had positive associations with agriculture in Wisconsin but not in Iowa. Remnant forest patches in agricultural landscapes may be providing refuges for some anuran species. Differences in anuran associations with deep water and permanent wetlands between the two states suggest opportunities for management action. Large-scale maps can contribute to predictive models of amphibian habitat use, but water quality and vegetation information collected from individual wetlands will likely be needed to strengthen those predictions. Landscape habitat analyses provide a framework for future experimental and intensive research on specific factors affecting the health of anurans.
引用
收藏
页码:1437 / 1446
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LANDSCAPE ECOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, FRAGSTATS SPATIAL PA
[3]  
Ashley EP, 1996, CAN FIELD NAT, V110, P403
[4]  
BEEBEE T J C, 1985, Amphibia-Reptilia, V6, P35, DOI 10.1163/156853885X00164
[5]  
Berrill M, 1997, AMPHIBIANS DECLINE C, P233
[6]  
BLAUSTEIN AR, 1991, SCIENCE, V247, P1033
[7]  
BONIN J, 1997, AMPHIBIANS DECLINE C, P141
[8]  
Casper G. S, 1996, GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUT
[9]  
Christiansen J. L., 1991, SALAMANDERS FROGS IO
[10]   Response of amphibians to clearcutting, burning, and glyphosate application in the Oregon coast range [J].
Cole, EC ;
McComb, WC ;
Newton, M ;
Chambers, CL ;
Leeming, JP .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1997, 61 (03) :656-664