Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation

被引:706
作者
Jaeger, JAG [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Technol Assessment Baden Wurttemberg, D-70565 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
effective mesh size; fragmentation phases; landscape division; landscape fragmentation; landscape indices; landscape pattern; quantitative methods; spatial heterogeneity; splitting index;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008129329289
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic fragmentation of landscapes is known as a major reason for the loss of species in industrialized countries. Landscape fragmentation caused by roads, railway lines, extension of settlement areas, etc., further enhances the dispersion of pollutants and acoustic emissions and affects local climatic conditions, water balance, scenery, and land use. In this study, three new measures of fragmentation are introduced: degree of landscape division (D), splitting index (S), and effective mesh size (m). They characterize the anthropogenic penetration of landscapes from a geometric point of view and are calculated from the distribution function of the remaining patch sizes. First, D, S, and m are defined, their mathematical properties are discussed, and their reactions to the six fragmentation phases of perforation, incision, dissection, dissipation, shrinkage, and attrition are analysed. Then they are compared with five other known fragmentation indices with respect to nine suitability criteria such as intuitive interpretation, low sensivity to very small patches, monotonous reaction to different fragmentation phases, and detection of structural differences. Their ability to distinguish spatial patterns is illustrated by means of two series of model patterns. In particular, the effective mesh size (m), representing an intensive and area-proportionately additive measure, proves to be well suited for comparing the fragmentation of regions with differing total size.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 130
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] BERG M, 1994, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V3, P487
  • [2] BOWEN GW, 1981, ORNL PUBLICATION, V1719
  • [3] BURGESS RL, 1981, ECOLOGICAL STUDIES, V41
  • [4] Chandler D., 1987, INTRO MODERN STAT ME
  • [5] DEGGAU M, 1992, 1070600103UBAFB92084
  • [6] Forman R.T. T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge
  • [7] Forman RTT., 1986, Landscape Ecology
  • [8] Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles
    Franklin, Jerry E.
    Forman, Richard T. T.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1987, 1 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [9] BEST SHAPE FOR NATURE RESERVES
    GAME, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1980, 287 (5783) : 630 - 632
  • [10] Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS
    Geoghegan, J
    Wainger, LA
    Bockstael, NE
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 23 (03) : 251 - 264