The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis

被引:244
作者
Richardson, Leslie [1 ]
Loomis, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Threatened and endangered species; Meta-analysis; Benefit transfer; Willingness-to-pay; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEY; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SPOTTED OWL; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; PROTECTION PROGRAM; PUBLIC GOOD; BENEFITS; WILDLIFE; PRESERVATION; EXISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper updates a 1996 meta-analysis of studies using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to value threatened, endangered and rare species published in this journal by Loomis and White. A variable for studies conducted in or after 1995 was added to the model to test if new studies are systematically different from old studies and identify which explanatory variables influencing willingness-to-pay (WTP) for these species have changed over time. Generally newer studies yielded higher WTP. Variables such as the change in the size of the species population, payment frequency, survey mode, response rate, type of respondent, type of species, and a new variable for whether a species is a 'charismatic megafauna' or not, whether the species has use and nonuse value versus nonuse value only and year of the study, were found to significantly influence WTP. This model is used in a benefit transfer example and a comparison of original study estimates and model estimates is made to compare its accuracy. The average within sample benefit transfer error was 34-45%. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1535 / 1548
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], T 57 N AM WILDL NAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, THESIS OHIO STATE U
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], WOLVES YELLOWSTONE
[5]   Can hypothetical questions reveal true values? A laboratory comparison of dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent values with auction values [J].
Balistreri, E ;
McClelland, G ;
Poe, G ;
Schulze, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 18 (03) :275-292
[6]  
Bell K. P., 2003, Marine Resource Economics, V18, P15
[7]  
Berrens RP, 1996, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V21, P294
[8]   USE OF DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE NONMARKET METHODS TO VALUE THE WHOOPING CRANE RESOURCE [J].
BOWKER, JM ;
STOLL, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 70 (02) :372-381
[9]   WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT GROUNDWATER VALUES - PRELIMINARY IMPLICATIONS FROM A METAANALYSIS OF CONTINGENT-VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
POE, GL ;
BERGSTROM, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1055-1061
[10]   VALUING WILDLIFE IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSES - A CASE-STUDY INVOLVING ENDANGERED SPECIES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
BISHOP, RC .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (05) :943-950