Model for predicting the field drying characteristics of grass conditioned by maceration (severe treatment)

被引:4
作者
Hamer, PJC [1 ]
Knight, AC
McGechan, MB
Cooper, G
机构
[1] Silsoe Res Inst, Silsoe MK45 4HS, Beds, England
[2] SAC, Environm Div, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] SAC, Scottish Ctr Agr Engn, Penicuik EH26 0PH, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH | 2000年 / 75卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jaer.1999.0509
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In grass conservation systems, removal of moisture in the field is required to avoid effluent production during storage. When high drying rates are required these can be achieved by a macerating process that increases the specific surface area of the plants, ruptures plant cell walls and releases intracellular moisture to the surface of the plant material. Grass composition changes during growth from being predominately leaf generation to an increasing proportion of stem material and this has an effect on drying. A new model for estimating field drying characteristics was developed using data from laboratory drying experiments that measured the resistance to vapour pressure transfer for single leaves and stems. The model was based on the Penman-Monteith equation in which a canopy resistance parameter describes the rate of drying. The influence of the leaf and stem proportions, the moisture content at the time of cutting and the severity of the treatment on rates of moisture loss were simulated. Predicted initial drying rates agreed with measurements of actual, drying rates to within 2% during four field experiments. The higher the initial moisture content the faster the leaves dried. Macerated stems dried about two times faster than untreated stems, whereas macerated leaves were only 20% faster than untreated leaves. (C) 2000 Silsoe Research Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 289
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Notes on radiation in the atmosphere [J].
Brunt, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1932, 58 :389-420
[2]  
DELORENZI F, 1994, IFAC ISHS WORKSH
[3]  
DONE DL, 1989, RES DEV AGRIC, V6, P41
[4]   WATER-LOSS FROM CUT HERBAGE IN WINDROW AND FROM ISOLATED LEAVES AND STEMS [J].
FIRTH, DR ;
LESHEM, Y .
AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1976, 17 (04) :261-269
[5]   Silage dry matter content and predicted effluent production in England and Wales 1984-1994 [J].
Haigh, PM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1997, 66 (01) :63-77
[6]   A LABORATORY TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATING AND COMPARING FORAGE CONDITIONING MECHANISMS [J].
HALE, OD .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1986, 33 (04) :243-256
[7]  
Jones H. G., 1992, Plant and microclimate
[8]   THE RATE OF WATER-LOSS FROM CUT GRASS OF DIFFERENT SPECIES DRIED AT 20-DEGREES-C [J].
JONES, L ;
PRICKETT, J .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1981, 36 (01) :17-23
[9]   DESIGN EVALUATION OF CROP CONDITIONERS WITH PLASTIC ELEMENTS [J].
KLINNER, WE ;
HALE, OD .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1984, 30 (03) :255-263
[10]  
MCGECHAN MB, 1990, J AGR ENG RES, V45, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0021-8634(05)80056-3