Increase of Rejection Rate in Case-Control Studies with the Differential Genotyping Error Rates

被引:14
作者
Ahn, Kwangmi
Gordon, Derek [1 ]
Finch, Stephen J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY USA
关键词
misclassification; genotyping error; SAMPLE-SIZE CALCULATIONS; CASE-CONTROL ASSOCIATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; LINEAR TRENDS; POWER; TESTS; PROPORTIONS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.2202/1544-6115.1429
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
070307 [化学生物学]; 071010 [生物化学与分子生物学];
摘要
Genotyping error adversely affects the statistical power of case-control association studies and introduces bias in the estimated parameters when the same error mechanism and probabilities apply to both affected and unaffected individuals; that is, when there is non-differential genotype misclassification. Simulation studies have shown that differential genotype misclassification leads to a rejection rate that is higher than the nominal significance level (type I error rate) for some tests of association. This study extends previous work by examining this issue analytically using the non-centrality parameter of the asymptotic distribution of the chi-squared test and linear trend test (LTT) when there is no difference between case and control genotype frequencies, but there is differential misclassification with SNP data. The parameters examined are the minor allele frequency (MAF) and sample size. When MAF is less than 0.2, differential genotyping errors lead to a rejection rate much larger than the nominal significance level. As the MAF decreases to zero, the increase in the rejection rate becomes larger. The errors that most increase the rejection rate are differential recording of the more common homozygote as the other homozygote and differential recording of the more common homozygote as the heterozygote. The rejection rate increases as the sample size increases for fixed differential genotyping error rates and nominal significance level for each test.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the cochran-armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies [J].
Ahn, Kwangmi ;
Haynes, Chad ;
Kim, Wonkuk ;
St. Fleur, Rose ;
Gordon, Derek ;
Finch, Stephen J. .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 71 :249-U4
[2]
TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[3]
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls [J].
Burton, Paul R. ;
Clayton, David G. ;
Cardon, Lon R. ;
Craddock, Nick ;
Deloukas, Panos ;
Duncanson, Audrey ;
Kwiatkowski, Dominic P. ;
McCarthy, Mark I. ;
Ouwehand, Willem H. ;
Samani, Nilesh J. ;
Todd, John A. ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Barrett, Jeffrey C. ;
Davison, Dan ;
Easton, Doug ;
Evans, David ;
Leung, Hin-Tak ;
Marchini, Jonathan L. ;
Morris, Andrew P. ;
Spencer, Chris C. A. ;
Tobin, Martin D. ;
Attwood, Antony P. ;
Boorman, James P. ;
Cant, Barbara ;
Everson, Ursula ;
Hussey, Judith M. ;
Jolley, Jennifer D. ;
Knight, Alexandra S. ;
Koch, Kerstin ;
Meech, Elizabeth ;
Nutland, Sarah ;
Prowse, Christopher V. ;
Stevens, Helen E. ;
Taylor, Niall C. ;
Walters, Graham R. ;
Walker, Neil M. ;
Watkins, Nicholas A. ;
Winzer, Thilo ;
Jones, Richard W. ;
McArdle, Wendy L. ;
Ring, Susan M. ;
Strachan, David P. ;
Pembrey, Marcus ;
Breen, Gerome ;
St Clair, David ;
Caesar, Sian ;
Gordon-Smith, Katherine ;
Jones, Lisa ;
Fraser, Christine ;
Green, Elain K. .
NATURE, 2007, 447 (7145) :661-678
[4]
ASYMPTOTIC POWER OF CHI SQUARE TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS [J].
CHAPMAN, DG ;
NAM, JM .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :315-&
[5]
Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association study [J].
Clayton, DG ;
Walker, NM ;
Smyth, DJ ;
Pask, R ;
Cooper, JD ;
Maier, LM ;
Smink, LJ ;
Lam, AC ;
Ovington, NR ;
Stevens, HE ;
Nutland, S ;
Howson, JMM ;
Faham, M ;
Moorhead, M ;
Jones, HB ;
Falkowski, M ;
Hardenbol, P ;
Willis, TD ;
Todd, JA .
NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (11) :1243-1246
[6]
SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[7]
Power and sample size calculations in the presence of phenotype errors for case/control genetic association studies [J].
Edwards, BJ ;
Haynes, C ;
Levenstien, MA ;
Finch, SJ ;
Gordon, D .
BMC GENETICS, 2005, 6 (1)
[8]
A transmission disequilibrium test for general pedigrees that is robust to the presence of random genotyping errors and any number of untyped parents [J].
Gordon, D ;
Haynes, C ;
Johnnidis, C ;
Patel, SB ;
Bowcock, AM ;
Ott, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2004, 12 (09) :752-761
[9]
Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: Application to single nucleotide polymorphisms [J].
Gordon, D ;
Finch, SJ ;
Nothnagel, M ;
Ott, J .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 2002, 54 (01) :22-33
[10]
A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data [J].
Gordon, D ;
Heath, SC ;
Liu, X ;
Ott, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 69 (02) :371-380