Epidemiological investigations of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Argentina

被引:29
作者
Perez, AM [1 ]
Ward, MR
Carpenter, IE
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Vet Pathobiol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/vr.154.25.777
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
A total of 2126 herds, an attack rate of 0.82 per cent, were affected during an epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in Argentina in 2001. The spatial and temporal distribution of the epidemic was investigated using nearest-neighbour and spatial scan tests and by estimating the frequency distributions of the times to intervention, and distances and times between outbreaks. The outbreaks were clustered and associated significantly (P<0.01) with herd density; 94 per cent were located in the Pampeana region, where the cattle population is concentrated, which had an attack rate of 1.4 per cent. The clustering results suggested that the virus had spread locally between outbreaks. Most of the outbreaks were separated by one day and the maximum distance between outbreaks was almost 2000 km, indicating that the infection spread rapidly over large distances. The index outbreak was detected more than 15 days after the primary outbreak, and restrictions on the movement of cattle were probably not enforced until about one month after infection Occurred. As in other major epidemics, the period between the first outbreaks and the effective application of control strategies was probably crucial in determining the progress of the epidemic.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, REPORT COMMITTEE INQ
[2]   Results of epidemic simulation modeling to evaluate strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease [J].
Bates, TW ;
Thurmond, MC ;
Carpenter, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (02) :205-210
[3]  
CANE B, 2001, INT C PREV CONTR FOO
[4]  
Chmitelin I, 2002, REV SCI TECH OIE, V21, P731
[5]   The foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the United Kingdom 2001 [J].
Davies, G .
COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 25 (5-6) :331-343
[6]   AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE IN AUSTRALIA - A REGIONAL APPROACH [J].
GARNER, MG ;
LACK, MB .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (1-2) :9-32
[7]   Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months [J].
Gibbens, JC ;
Sharpe, CE ;
Wilesmith, JW ;
Mansley, LM ;
Michalopoulou, E ;
Ryan, JBM ;
Hudson, M .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2001, 149 (24) :729-+
[8]   Mathematical modelling of the foot and mouth disease epidemic of 2001: Strengths and weaknesses [J].
Green, LE ;
Medley, GF .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2002, 73 (03) :201-205
[9]   EPIDEMIOLOGICAL-STUDIES ON 1967-1968 FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE EPIDEMIC - REPORTING OF SUSPECTED DISEASE [J].
HUGHJONES, ME .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1976, 77 (03) :299-306
[10]  
Jacquez GM, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1935, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960930)15:18<1935::AID-SIM406>3.0.CO