Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: Impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:260
作者
Allaf, ME [1 ]
Palapattu, GS [1 ]
Trock, BJ [1 ]
Carter, HB [1 ]
Walsh, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Med Inst,Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; lymph node excision; prognosis; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates the influence of the anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy on lymph node yield, staging accuracy and time to prostate specific antigen progression. Materials and Methods: Between February 1992 and April 2003, 2 surgeons at 1 hospital performed 2,135 and 1,865 radical prostatectomies with pelvic lymph node dissection, respectively. One surgeon routinely performed an extended lymph node dissection while the second surgeon performed a limited pelvic lymphadenectomy. The number of lymph nodes extracted and the number of patients with positive lymph nodes detected were analyzed and compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups of patients with occult nodal disease. Results: Extended lymph node dissection removed more lymph nodes (mean 11.6 vs 8.9, p <0.0001) and detected more lymph node positive disease (3.2% vs 1.1%, p <0.0001) than the more anatomically limited technique. This finding held true for patients across all pathology groups. Among men with lymph node positive disease involving less than 15% of extracted nodes, the 5-year prostate specific antigen progression-free rate for extended lymph node dissection was 43% versus 10% for the more limited lymph node dissection (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Compared to limited lymph node dissection, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to identify men with positive lymph nodes more frequently. A significant benefit in biochemical recurrence-free survival may exist for certain subgroups undergoing the extended dissection. However, because the results may be influenced by stage migration, longer followup is necessary to determine whether the apparent therapeutic effect persists.
引用
收藏
页码:1840 / 1844
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[2]   Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :849-854
[3]   PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY CAN BE OMITTED IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF PATIENT SELECTION [J].
BISHOFF, JT ;
REYES, A ;
THOMPSON, IM ;
HARRIS, MJ ;
STCLAIR, SR ;
GOMELLA, L ;
BUTZIN, CA .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :270-274
[4]   Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph node's retrieved in cystectomy specimens [J].
Bochner, BH ;
Herr, HW ;
Reuter, VE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2295-2296
[5]   Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Clark, T ;
Parekh, DJ ;
Cookson, MS ;
Chang, SS ;
Smith, ER ;
Wells, N ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :145-147
[6]   THE ROGERS,WILL PHENOMENON - STAGE MIGRATION AND NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES AS A SOURCE OF MISLEADING STATISTICS FOR SURVIVAL IN CANCER [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SOSIN, DM ;
WELLS, CK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (25) :1604-1608
[7]  
FOWLER JE, 1981, CANCER, V47, P2941, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810615)47:12<2941::AID-CNCR2820471235>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]   Prostate cancer: Anatomical and surgical considerations [J].
GilVernet, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 78 (02) :161-168
[10]   RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR STAGE-D1 PROSTATE-CANCER - PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES AND RESULTS OF TREATMENT [J].
GOLIMBU, M ;
PROVET, J ;
ALASKARI, S ;
MORALES, P .
UROLOGY, 1987, 30 (05) :427-435