Transfer for urgent percutaneous coronary intervention early after thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The TRANSFER-AMI pilot feasibility study

被引:14
作者
Cantor, Warren J.
Burstein, Jason
Choi, Richard
Heffernan, Michael
Dzavik, Vladimir
Lazzam, Charles
Duic, Marko
Fitchett, David
Tan, Mary
Wawrzyniak, Janet
Kassam, Saleem
Dhingra, Sanjay
Morrison, Laurie J.
Langer, Anatoly
Goodman, Shaun G.
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Newmarket, Suffolk, England
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Rouge Valley Ajax & Pickering, Ajax, ON, Canada
[5] St Josephs Hlth Care Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Oakville Trafalgar Mem Hosp, Oakville, ON, Canada
[7] Toronto Gen Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Trillium Hlth Ctr, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[9] Canadian Heart Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Rouge Valley Centenary, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[11] Sunnybrook Med Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
angioplasty; clinical trials; myocardial infarction; thrombolysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70948-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Most hospitals in Canada do not have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities and use thrombolysis as reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Urgent PCI after thrombolysis may optimize reperfusion and prevent reinfarction and recurrent ischemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of transferring high-risk STEMI patients front community hospitals in Ontario to PCI centres for urgent PCI within 6 h of thrombolysis. METHODS: Patients with anterior or high-risk inferior STEMI received tenecteplase and were urgently transferred to PCI centres. PCI was performed if at least 70% stenosis was present in the infarct-related artery, regardless of flow, using coronary stents. Transfer of stable patients back to community hospitals was encouraged 24 h to 48 h after PCI. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were transferred and underwent PCI a median of 3.9 h (range 2.7 h to 6.4 h) after thrombolysis. No complications occurred during transfer. One death occurred that was related to failed reperfusion and cardiogenic shock. Minor access-site bleeding occurred in five patients. Fifteen patients were transferred back to their community hospitals within 24 h of PCI. There were no further deaths or reinfarctions at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of high-risk STEMI patients for urgent PCI within 6 h after thrombolysis appears feasible. The randomized trial phase of the Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) will compare this strategy with standard treatment after thrombolysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1126
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Antman Elliott M., 2004, J Am Coll Cardiol, V44, pE1, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.014
  • [2] A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (13) : 1530 - 1538
  • [3] Armstrong PW, 2004, CAN J CARDIOL, V20, P1075
  • [4] HEMORRHAGIC EVENTS DURING THERAPY WITH RECOMBINANT TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR, HEPARIN, AND ASPIRIN FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF THE THROMBOLYSIS IN MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION (TIMI), PHASE-II TRIAL
    BOVILL, EG
    TERRIN, ML
    STUMP, DC
    BERKE, AD
    FREDERICK, M
    COLLEN, D
    FEIT, F
    GORE, JM
    HILLIS, LD
    LAMBREW, CT
    LEIBOFF, R
    MANN, KG
    MARKIS, JE
    PRATT, CM
    SHARKEY, SW
    SOPKO, G
    TRACY, RP
    CHESEBRO, JH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (04) : 256 - 265
  • [5] Cantor Warren J., 2001, Curr Interv Cardiol Rep, V3, P321
  • [6] Immediate angioplasty after thrombolysis: a systematic review
    Cantor, WJ
    Brunet, F
    Ziegler, CP
    Kiss, A
    Morrison, LJ
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 173 (12) : 1473 - 1481
  • [7] Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction - A meta-analysis
    Dalby, M
    Bouzamondo, A
    Lechat, P
    Montalescot, G
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (15) : 1809 - 1814
  • [8] Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1):: a randomised controlled trial
    Fernandez-Avilés, F
    Alonso, JJ
    Castro-Beiras, A
    Vázquez, N
    Blanco, J
    Alonso-Briales, J
    López-Mesa, J
    Fernández-Vazquez, F
    Calvo, I
    Martínez-Elbal, L
    San Román, JA
    Ramos, B
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9439) : 1045 - 1053
  • [9] Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials
    Keeley, EC
    Boura, JA
    Grines, CL
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) : 13 - 20
  • [10] Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study)
    Le May, MR
    Wells, GA
    Labinaz, M
    Davies, RF
    Turek, M
    Leddy, D
    Maloney, J
    McKibbin, T
    Quinn, B
    Beanlands, RS
    Glover, C
    Marquis, JF
    O'Brien, ER
    Williams, WL
    Higginson, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (03) : 417 - 424