Strength, reliability and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) dental ceramics

被引:187
作者
Guazza, M
Proos, K
Quach, L
Swain, MV
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, United Dent Hosp, Fac Dent, Biomat Sci Res Unit, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, United Dent Hosp, Sch Aerosp Mech & Mechatron Engn, Biomat Sci Res Unit, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
ceramic structure; dental restorative material; zirconia;
D O I
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.036
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the biaxial flexural strength, reliability and the mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/ zirconia (Y-TZP) disks. For this purpose, 80 specimens were made from conventional dental porcelain and Y-TZP core ceramic, and equally divided into four groups as follows: monolithic specimens of porcelain; monolithic specimens of core material; bilayered specimens with the porcelain on top (facing the loading piston during testing); bilayered specimens with core material on top. The maximum load at fracture was calculated with a biaxial flexural test and finite element analysis was used to estimate the maximum tensile stress at fracture. Results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD. The reliability of strength was analyzed with the Weibull distribution. SEM was used to identify the initial crack and characterize the fracture mode. Monolithic core specimens and bilayered sample with the core material on the bottom were statistically significantly stronger than monolithic porcelain disks and bilayered samples with the porcelain on the bottom. The study, which was conducted with sample configurations that reproduce the clinical situation of crowns and fixed partial dentures. indicates that the material which lies on the bottom surface dictates the strength, reliability and fracture mode of the specimens. The contribution of strong and tough core materials to the performance of all-ceramics restorations may be offset by the weaker veneering porcelain if the actual distribution of the tensile stresses within the restoration is not taken into consideration. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5045 / 5052
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Anusavice K J, 1992, Int J Prosthodont, V5, P351
[2]  
ASHBY MF, 1988, INTRO MICROSTRUCTURE
[3]  
ASTM, 2001, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND
[4]   Fracture energy of glass-alumina interfaces via the bimaterial bend test [J].
Cazzato, A ;
Faber, KT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1997, 80 (01) :181-188
[5]  
Chong KH, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P183
[6]  
*FEA D COMP, 1999, US STRAND7, P1
[7]  
GUAZZATO M, IN PRESS INT J PROST
[8]  
GUAZZATO M, IN PRESS DENT MAT
[9]   Kinking of a Crack Out of an Interface [J].
He, Ming-Yuan ;
Hutchinson, John W. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1989, 56 (02) :270-278
[10]   CRACK DEFLECTION AT AN INTERFACE BETWEEN DISSIMILAR ELASTIC-MATERIALS [J].
HE, MY ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1989, 25 (09) :1053-1067