Outcome after intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic appendectomy techniques

被引:22
作者
Suttie, SA [1 ]
Seth, S [1 ]
Driver, CP [1 ]
Mahomed, AA [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Alexandra Hosp Children, Dept Paediat Surg, Brighton BN1 3JN, E Sussex, England
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2004年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
appendectomy; laparoscopic; pediatric; technique;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-003-9135-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aimed to assess the outcome after intracorporeal (IC) and extracorporeal (EC) laparoscopic appendectomy technique in a single institution over a 5-year period. Methods: Records of all children (n=60) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at the Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital between February 1997 and March 2002 were retrieved and evaluated. Observations were made regarding operative technique, anesthetic time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative analgesic requirement, and postoperative hospital stay. Results: There were 30 children in each group who had a similar demographic profile. The magnitude of appendicitis severity in both groups was similar. The mean anesthetic time was 67.8 min for the IC group and 50.7 min for the EC group (p=0.001). There were no recorded intraoperative complications, although a single case in the EC group required conversion to open procedure. The postoperative analgesic requirement in both groups was similar. The mean postoperative stay was 2.1 days in the IC group and 2.5 days in the EC group. Two postoperative complications were noted in the IC group; one intraperitoneal collection and one postoperative chest infection. Four complications occured in the EC group; one intraperitoneal collection and three minor port-site wound infections. Conclusions: The authors' experience shows the EC technique to be significantly quicker, although with a slightly increased complication rate. Either technique can be applied safely for acute appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1125
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ATTWOOD SEA, 1992, SURGERY, V112, P497
[2]   Acute appendicitis: the continuing role for active observation [J].
Bachoo, P ;
Mahomed, AA ;
Ninan, GK ;
Youngson, GG .
PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 17 (2-3) :125-128
[3]   Port-exteriorization appendectomy (PEA): a preliminary report [J].
El-Gohary, MA ;
El-Marsafawy, M .
PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 17 (01) :39-41
[4]   ACTIVE OBSERVATION IN MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN IN CHILDHOOD [J].
JONES, PF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 2 (6035) :551-553
[5]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY FOR SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
KOLLIAS, J ;
HARRIES, RHC ;
OTTO, G ;
HAMILTON, DW ;
COX, JST ;
GALLERY, RM .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 64 (12) :830-835
[6]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN APPENDECTOMY [J].
KUM, CK ;
NGOI, SS ;
GOH, PMY ;
TEKANT, Y ;
ISAAC, JR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (12) :1599-1600
[7]   Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children [J].
Lintula, H ;
Kokki, H ;
Vanamo, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (04) :510-514
[8]   Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? [J].
Little, DC ;
Custer, MD ;
May, BH ;
Blalock, SE ;
Cooney, DR .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2002, 37 (03) :310-316
[9]   OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON [J].
MARTIN, LC ;
PUENTE, I ;
SOSA, JL ;
BASSIN, A ;
BRESLAW, R ;
MCKENNEY, MG ;
GINZBURG, E ;
SLEEMAN, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (03) :256-262
[10]   Laparoscopic appendectomy in children:: A favorable alternative in simple and complicated appendicitis [J].
Meguerditchian, AN ;
Prasil, P ;
Cloutier, R ;
Leclerc, S ;
Péloquin, J ;
Roy, G .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2002, 37 (05) :695-698