Accuracy of point-of-care-testing (POCT) for determining hemoglobin concentrations

被引:79
作者
Gehring, H
Hornberger, C
Dibbelt, L
Roth-Isigkeit, A
Gerlach, K
Schumacher, J
Schmucker, P
机构
[1] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Anesthesiol, D-23569 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, Inst Biomed Engn, D-23569 Lubeck, Germany
[3] Med Univ Lubeck, Inst Clin Chem, D-23569 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
cyano; hemoglobin concentration; methemoglobin; oximetry; Point-Of-Care-System;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460809.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: While point-of-care testing (POCT) is being used increasingly as a basis for deciding on perioperative erythrocyte transfusion, no valid standards currently exist concerning the accuracy of Hb concentration measurements. For clinical employment, however, the confidence limits (+/-2 SD) of these measurements should lie close to 5 g/l. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of point-of-care testing for blood hemoglobin concentration (cHb in g/l) measurements in critically ill patients. Methods: Fifty blood samples from 50 postoperative patients requiring intensive care treatment were withdrawn from a cannula in the radial artery into a 2-ml heparinized syringe (containing wet sodium heparinate in the conus), in a 2-ml Monovette with 50 IE lithium heparinate, and into a 2.7-ml cuvette with 1.6 mg potassium EDTA/ml blood. The POCT battery consisted of two blood gas analyzers (ABL(TM) 625 and 725, Radiometer, Copenhagen), the HemoCue ((R)) system (Mallinckrodt Medical, Germany), and an automated hematology analyzer (M-2000((R)), Sysmex, Germany). The cyanmethemoglobin method served as the reference 'gold standard' procedure. The blood gas analyzer and HemoCue((R)) systems were tested using dry and wet heparinized blood samples. Results: Hemoglobin concentrations of the reference measurements ranged from 73.9 to 159.4 g/l. The automated hematology analyzer method did reveal a small but systematic deviation for higher cHb values. For the blood gas analyzer and HemoCue((R)) system procedures there was no systematic deviation of bias for either the first measurement or the averaged data. Bland & Altman analysis revealed a larger scattering for the wet heparinized samples. Conclusions: The above-stated requirement for POCT systems, i.e. that the confidence limits should lie close to 5 g/l cHb, held true for the dry heparinized samples of the blood gas analyzer (1st measurement and mean of 2), the HemoCue((R)) system (mean of 3) and the automated hematology analyzer.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 986
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] *DIN, 1995, 58931 DIN
  • [3] EHRMEYER SS, 1999, BLOOD GAS NEWS, V8, P20
  • [4] NEAR-PATIENT MEASUREMENTS OF METHEMOGLOBIN, OXYGEN-SATURATION, AND TOTAL HEMOGLOBIN - EVALUATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR ADULT AND NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE
    GONG, AK
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (01) : 193 - 201
  • [5] Medical progress - Transfusion medicine (First of two parts) - Blood transfusion
    Goodnough, LT
    Brecher, ME
    Kanter, MH
    AuBuchon, JP
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (06) : 438 - 447
  • [6] HAUGHTON M A, 1987, Australian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, V8, P84
  • [7] A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care
    Hébert, PC
    Wells, G
    Blajchman, MA
    Marshall, J
    Martin, C
    Pagliarello, G
    Tweeddale, M
    Schweitzer, I
    Yetisir, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (06) : 409 - 417
  • [8] LESSON OF THE WEEK - TOO MUCH HEPARIN - POSSIBLE SOURCE OF ERROR IN BLOOD-GAS ANALYSIS
    HUTCHISON, AS
    RALSTON, SH
    DRYBURGH, FJ
    SMALL, M
    FOGELMAN, I
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 287 (6399) : 1131 - 1132
  • [9] International Committee for Standardization in Haematology, 1987, CLIN LAB HAEMATOL, V9, P73
  • [10] Perioperative on-site haemoglobin determination: As accurate as laboratory values?
    Jaeger, M
    Ashbury, T
    Adams, M
    Duncan, P
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (08): : 795 - 798