Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study

被引:111
作者
Pristipino, C. [1 ]
Trani, C. [2 ]
Nazzaro, M. S. [3 ]
Berni, A. [4 ]
Patti, G. [5 ]
Patrizi, R. [6 ]
Pironi, B. [7 ]
Mazzarotto, P. [8 ]
Gioffre, G. [9 ]
Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L. [10 ]
Richichi, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Filippo Neri Hosp, Rome, Italy
[2] Catholic Univ, Rome, Italy
[3] San Camillo Hosp, Rome, Italy
[4] St Andrea Hosp, Rome, Italy
[5] Campus Biomed Univ, Rome, Italy
[6] Policlin Casilino Hosp, Rome, Italy
[7] Madre G Vannini Hosp, Rome, Italy
[8] San Carlo Hosp, Rome, Italy
[9] St Eugenio Hosp, Rome, Italy
[10] San Giovanni Battista Molinette Univ Hosp, Turin, Italy
关键词
CORONARY INTERVENTION; FEMORAL APPROACH; DEFINITIONS; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/hrt.2008.150714
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To obtain a "snapshot'' view of accesss-pecific percutaneous cardiovascular procedures outcomes in the real world. Design: Multicentre, prospective study performed over a 30-day period. Setting: Nine hospitals with invasive cardiology facilities, reflecting the contemporary state of healthcare. Patients: Unselected consecutive sample of patients undergoing any percutaneous cardiovascular procedure requiring an arterial access. Interventions: Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures by radial or femoral access Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital (a) major and minor haemorrhages; (b) peri-procedural stroke; and (c) entrysite vascular complications. The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital death and myocardial infarction/reinfarction. For analysis purposes, outcomes were allocated to arterial access-determined study arms on an intention-to treat basis. Multivariable analysis adjusted using propensity score was performed to correct for selection bias related to arterial site. Results: A total of 1052 patients were enrolled: 509 underwent radial access and 543 femoral access. In both groups, 40% underwent a coronary angioplasty. Relative to femoral access, radial access was associated with a lower incidence both of primary (4.2% vs 1.96%, p = 0.03, respectively) and secondary endpoints (3.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for procedural and clinical confounders, confirmed that intention-to-access via the radial route was significantly and independently associated with a decreased risk both of primary (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.84) and secondary endpoints (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.62). Conclusions: Our study indicates strikingly better outcomes of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures with radial access versus femoral access in contemporary, real-world clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 482
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
De Benedictis, ML ;
Rigattieri, S ;
Turri, M ;
Anselmi, M ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Louvard, Y ;
Hamon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :349-356
[2]   Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation [J].
Allen, C ;
Glasziou, P ;
Del Mar, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9186) :1229-1233
[3]   Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial [J].
Brasselet, Camille ;
Tassan, Sophie ;
Nazeyrollas, Pierre ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Metz, Damien .
HEART, 2007, 93 (12) :1556-1561
[4]   Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Boston, R ;
Farrar, JT ;
Strom, BL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 158 (03) :280-287
[5]   Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) [J].
Chase, A. J. ;
Fretz, E. B. ;
Warburton, W. P. ;
Klinke, W. P. ;
Carere, R. G. ;
Pi, D. ;
Berry, B. ;
Hilton, J. D. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (08) :1019-1025
[6]   Clinical end point definitions after percutaneous coronary intervention and their relationship to late mortality: an assessment by attributable risk [J].
Chew, DP ;
Bhatt, DL ;
Lincoff, AM ;
Wolski, K ;
Topol, EJ .
HEART, 2006, 92 (07) :945-950
[7]   Comparable clinical outcomes with paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in unrestricted contemporary practice [J].
Cosgrave, John ;
Melzi, Gloria ;
Corbett, Simon ;
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L. ;
Agostoni, Pierfrancesco ;
Babic, Rade ;
Airoldi, Flavio ;
Chieffio, Alaide ;
Sangiorgi, Giuseppe M. ;
Montorfano, Matteo ;
Michev, Iassen ;
Carlino, Mauro ;
Colombo, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (24) :2320-2328
[8]  
Hamon Martial, 2007, EuroIntervention, V3, P400, DOI 10.4244/EIJV3I3A71
[9]  
Louvard Y, 2001, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V52, P181, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200102)52:2<181::AID-CCD1044>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-G