Trade liberalization and compensation

被引:31
作者
Davidson, Carl [1 ]
Matusz, Steven J.
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Nottingham, GEP, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00394.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Liberalization harms some groups while generating aggregate benefits. We consider various labor market policies that might be used to compensate those who lose from freer trade. Our goal is to find the policy that compensates each group of losers at the lowest cost to the economy. We argue that wage subsidies should be used to compensate those who bear the adjustment costs triggered by liberalization whereas employment subsidies should be used to compensate those who remain trapped in the previously protected sector. Our analysis indicates that the cost of compensation is low, provided that the right policy is used.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 747
页数:25
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D, 1999, ECON J, V109, pF112
  • [2] [Anonymous], SAVING FREE TRADE PR
  • [3] BAILY MN, 1993, GROWTH EQUITY
  • [4] TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE - WELFARE AND INCENTIVE EFFECTS OF PAYMENTS TO DISPLACED WORKERS
    BRANDER, JA
    SPENCER, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 36 (3-4) : 239 - 261
  • [5] PARETO GAINS FROM TRADE, RECONSIDERED - COMPENSATING FOR JOBS LOST
    BRECHER, RA
    CHOUDHRI, EU
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 36 (3-4) : 223 - 238
  • [6] Burtless Gary., 1998, Globaphobia: Confronting Fears about Open Trade
  • [7] Davidson C, 2004, POLITICAL EC TRADE A
  • [8] DAVIDSON C, 2004, TRADE LIBERALIZATION
  • [9] DAVIDSON C, 2002, GLOBALIZATION LABOR, P66
  • [10] Davis S., 1996, JOB CREATION DESTRUC