Willingness to pay for flood risk reduction and its determinants in Japan

被引:69
作者
Zhai, Guofang
Sato, Teruko
Fukuzono, Teruki
Ikeda, Saburo
Yoshida, Kentaro
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst Earth Sci & Disaster Prevent, NIED, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050006, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2006年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
willingness to pay (WTP); flood risk reduction; contingent valuation method (CVM); Japan;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04505.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aimed to clarify public preferences for flood control measures in Japan, willingness to pay (WTP), and the main factors involved in WTP by applying the contingent valuation method. Findings showed that most residents surveyed expected some flood control measures, and revealed a diversity of interest in river management. WTP levels for different measures ranged from a mean of Y2,887 to Y4,861 and from a median of Y1,000 to Y2,000. However, WTP for additional flood risk reduction beyond initial levels was found to be zero. This was considered to be because WTP for flood risk reduction must be determined within a multi-risk context. WTP for flood control measures may increase with per capita income, individual preparedness, and/or experience with flooding, but may decrease with distance from a river, acceptability of flood risk, and provision of environmental information. Furthermore, perception of flood risk may increase WTP, while perception of other risks may decrease it. Methods of dealing with environmental risk that were proposed in the survey may have affected WTP levels.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 940
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   GIVING WITH IMPURE ALTRUISM - APPLICATIONS TO CHARITY AND RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1447-1458
[2]  
[Anonymous], EC VALUATION STATED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, USING SURVEYS VALUE
[4]  
Bateman L.J, 2001, VALUING ENV PREFEREN
[5]  
*CAB OFF GOV JAP, 2001, PUBL POLL WAT
[6]  
CARSON RT, 1999, VALUING ENV PREFEREN, P109
[7]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[8]   Some further implications of incorporating the warm glow of giving into welfare measures:: A comment on the use of donation mechanisms by Champ et al [J].
Chilton, SM ;
Hutchinson, WG .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 37 (02) :202-209
[9]   Why do we still not apply what we know about managing R&D personnel? [J].
Clarke, TE .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 45 (02) :9-11
[10]  
Daun MC, 2000, 6 MARQ U I URB ENV R