Walking the walk? Community participation in HIA - A qualitative interview study

被引:32
作者
Kearney, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Med Practitioner Castlefields Hlth Ctr, Runcorn WA7 2HY, Cheshire, England
关键词
health impact assessment; community participation; regeneration;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although community participation is seen as central to the practice of health impact assessment (HIA), effective engagement of local people is notoriously difficult to achieve and risks being tokenistic. This qualitative study, set in a deprived estate in northwest England, examined how community participation, in the proposed HIA of a Regeneration Masterplan would be affected by the attitudes and experiences of key stakeholders. In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 stakeholders drawn from officials, representatives and local residents linked to the regeneration programme. The results suggest that there may be a large gap between professional rhetoric and the reality of community participation, and that barriers to community participation in HIA may be substantial and institutionalised. If these barriers are to be overcome, it is essential to acknowledge the existence of this rhetoric-reality gap and to address the training and resource needs of both professionals and community members. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 229
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anastacio Jean, 2000, Reflecting Realities: Participants' Perspectives on Integrated Communities and Sustainable Development
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Health Impact Assessment for regeneration projects. Volume 1. A Practical Guide
[3]  
[Anonymous], PART APPR HLTH PROM
[4]  
[Anonymous], MOD LOC GOV TOUCH PE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SAV LIV OUR HLTH NAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], IND DEPR 2000
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NAT STRAT NEIGHB REN
[9]  
[Anonymous], MERSEYSIDE GUIDELINE
[10]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224