The positive yield of imaging studies in the evaluation of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: A population based analysis

被引:41
作者
Albertsen, PC [1 ]
Hanley, JA
Harlan, LC
Gilliland, FD
Hamilton, A
Liff, JM
Stanford, JL
Stephenson, RA
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Div Urol, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[2] NCI, Appl Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] Univ Utah, Div Urol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67710-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determine the positive yield of imaging studies performed on men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A prospective, population based survey was conducted on 3,690 men with prostate cancer diagnosed between October 1, 1994, and October 31, 1995. Cases were identified by the rapid case ascertainment systems used in 6 geographic regions participating in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Based on information captured in primary medical record reviews we estimated the positive yield of bone scans, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The positive yield of bone scan and CT was less than 5% and 12%, respectively, for all men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4 to 20 ng./ml., and less than 2% and 9%, respectively, for those who also had a Gleason score of 6 or less. Only men with PSA greater than 50 ng./ml. and those with Gleason scores 8 to 10 and PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. had positive yields greater than 10% and 20% for bone scan and CT, respectively. Conclusions: Imaging studies designed to identify metastases and/or extracapsular extension in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer frequently have a low positive yield. Wide variations exist in the use of imaging studies and are associated with tumor factors, such as Gleason score and serum PSA, and nontumor factors, such as state of residence. More extensive cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to define appropriate guidelines for ordering imaging studies to optimize the positive yield among men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1143
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] *AM COLL RAD, 1995, EXP PAN UR IM PRETR
  • [2] A nationwide survey of practicing urologists: Current management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and clinically localized prostate cancer
    Barry, MJ
    Fowler, FJ
    Bin, L
    Oesterling, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) : 488 - 491
  • [3] PREDICTING RADIONUCLIDE BONE-SCAN FINDINGS IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED, UNTREATED PROSTATE-CANCER - PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IS SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER CLINICAL-PARAMETERS
    CHYBOWSKI, FM
    KELLER, JJL
    BERGSTRALH, EJ
    OESTERLING, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [4] PRACTICE TRENDS IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN THE UNITED-STATES
    GEE, WF
    HOLTGREWE, HL
    ALBERTSEN, PC
    LITWIN, MS
    MANYAK, MJ
    OLEARY, MP
    PAINTER, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) : 207 - 208
  • [5] Use of imaging tests for staging newly diagnosed prostate cancer: Trends from the CaPSURE database
    Kindrick, AV
    Grossfeld, GD
    Stier, DM
    Flanders, SC
    Henning, JM
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) : 2102 - 2106
  • [6] Cancer statistics, 1999
    Landis, SH
    Murray, T
    Bolden, S
    Wingo, PA
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1999, 49 (01) : 8 - 31
  • [7] ARE PELVIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, BONE-SCAN AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY NECESSARY IN THE STAGING OF PROSTATIC-CANCER
    LEVRAN, Z
    GONZALEZ, JA
    DIOKNO, AC
    JAFRI, SZH
    STEINERT, BW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (06): : 778 - 781
  • [8] Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer
    ODowd, GJ
    Veltri, RW
    Orozco, R
    Miller, MC
    Oesterling, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03) : 687 - 698
  • [9] Current trends in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging among United States urologists
    Plawker, MW
    Fleisher, JM
    Vapnek, EM
    Macchia, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) : 1853 - 1858
  • [10] Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: The prostate cancer outcomes study
    Potosky, AL
    Harlan, LC
    Stanford, JL
    Gilliland, FD
    Hamilton, AS
    Albertsen, PC
    Eley, JW
    Liff, JM
    Deapen, D
    Stephenson, RA
    Legler, J
    Ferrans, CE
    Talcott, JA
    Litwin, MS
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (20): : 1719 - 1724