Consumer Acceptance of Second-Generation GM Foods: The Case of Biofortified Cassava in the North-east of Brazil

被引:58
作者
Gonzalez, Carolina [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Nancy [3 ]
Qaim, Matin [4 ]
机构
[1] CIAT, Cali, Colombia
[2] Univ Hohenheim, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] ILRI, Livelihoods & Poverty Project, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Brazil; choice modelling; consumer behaviour; contingent valuation; genetically modified food; vitamin A; willingness to pay; D12; O32; O33; Q16; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CONSISTENCY; PREFERENCES; DEFICIENCY; BENEFITS; ADOPTION; RANKING;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00219.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Biofortified staple foods are currently being developed to reduce problems of micronutrient malnutrition among the poor. This partly involves use of genetic modification. Yet, relatively little is known about consumer acceptance of such second-generation genetically modified (GM) foods in developing countries. Here, we analyse consumer attitudes towards provitamin A GM cassava in the north-east of Brazil. Based on stated preference data, mean willingness to pay is estimated at 60-70% above market prices for traditional cassava. This is higher than the results from similar studies in developed countries, which is plausible given that micronutrient malnutrition is more severe in developing countries. GM foods with enhanced nutritive attributes seem to be well received by poor consumers. However, the results also suggest that acceptance would be still higher if provitamin A were introduced to cassava through conventional breeding. Some policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 624
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Interventions for micronutrient deficiency control in developing countries: Past, present and future [J].
Allen, LH .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 133 (11) :3875S-3878S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 5 REP WORLD NUTR SIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STAT FOOD INS WORLD
[4]  
[Anonymous], MAP POBR DES MUN BRA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN DEV REPORT 200
[6]   Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: A case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements [J].
Bateman, I. J. ;
Cole, M. A. ;
Georgiou, S. ;
Hadley, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (03) :221-231
[7]  
Bateman IJ., 2002, EC VALUATION STATED
[8]   Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape:: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in germany [J].
Breustedt, Gunnar ;
Mueller-Scheessel, Joerg ;
Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 59 (02) :237-256
[9]   Econometric issues in estimating consumer preferences from stated preference data: A case study of the value of automobile travel time [J].
Calfee, J ;
Winston, C ;
Stempski, R .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (04) :699-707
[10]   Testing the Consistency Between Standard Contingent Valuation, Repeated Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Azevedo, Christopher D. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 60 (01) :154-170