Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale

被引:115
作者
Boogaerts, JG
Vanacker, E
Seidel, L
Albert, A
Bardiau, FM
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, B-600 Charleroi, Belgium
[2] Univ Liege, Dept Biostat, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
assessment; visual analog scale (VAS); postoperative nausea; PONV;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440420.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Assessment of postoperative nausea intensity is difficult because nausea is a subjective and unpleasant sensation. We propose using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) device to increase the efficiency and precision in the assessment of nausea. We carried out a pilot study on postoperative patients suffering from nausea to measure the degree of agreement between the VAS scores and those given on a 4-point verbal descriptive scale (VDS). Methods: Postoperative nausea was evaluated by means of a classical VAS (0-10 cm) device and a 4-point VDS (0=no nausea, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) in 128 surgical spontaneously complaining patients. Evaluation was repeated 45 min after rescue medication given if nausea was intractable, lasted more than 10 min or at the request of the patient. Ordinal logistic regression was used to measure the association between VAS and VDS and to determine cut-off points on the VAS. Results: The VAS device was easily understood and used by patients. VAS scores decreased significantly from 5.5+/-2.3 to 1.4+/-1.8 after rescue medication (P=0.002). Application of ordinal logistic regression to pre- and pest-medication data combined yielded an agreement of 86% between VAS and VDS and the cut-off points on the VAS were Estimated as follows : 0-1 (no nausea), 1(+)-4 (mild), 4(+)-7 (moderate) and 7(+)-10 (severe). Conclusion: The VAS method proved to be useful for assessing quantitative nausea intensity and for testing the efficacy of rescue medication. It was found that a cut-off value of 4 on the VAS may be considered as a critical threshold triggering anaesthesiologists or nurses to administer rescue medication. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 44 (2000).
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 474
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CANCER-RELATED PAIN .2. ASSESSMENT WITH VISUAL ANALOG SCALES [J].
AHLES, TA ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLANCHARD, EB .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1984, 28 (02) :121-124
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF FEELINGS USING VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALES [J].
AITKEN, RCB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1969, 62 (10) :989-+
[3]  
ALBERT A, 1987, MULTIVARIATE INTERPR, P143
[4]   A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Greim, CA ;
Haubitz, I ;
Goepfert, C ;
Usadel, J ;
Sefrin, P ;
Roewer, N .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (05) :495-501
[5]   ANALYSIS OF STATISTICAL TESTS TO COMPARE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE MEASUREMENTS AMONG GROUPS [J].
DEXTER, F ;
CHESTNUT, DH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (04) :896-902
[6]   The graphic rating scale [J].
Freyd, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1923, 14 :83-102
[7]   WE STILL NEED COMMON CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
HERRSTEDT, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (09) :1217-1217
[8]  
HUSKISSON EC, 1974, LANCET, V2, P1127, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8
[9]   COMPARISON OF FIXED-INTERVAL AND VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALES FOR RATING CHRONIC PAIN [J].
JOYCE, CRB ;
ZUTSHI, DW ;
HRUBES, V ;
MASON, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 8 (06) :415-420
[10]   THE STUDY OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
KORTTILA, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (07) :S20-S23