Quantitative assessment of changes in patients' constructs of quality of life: An application of multilevel models

被引:16
作者
Lowy, A
Bernhard, J
机构
[1] Swiss Inst Appl Canc Res, SIAK Coordinating Ctr, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Inselspital Bern, Inst Med Oncol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
multilevel models; quality of life (QL); response-shift;
D O I
10.1023/B:QURE.0000037510.17893.d2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
It has often been proposed that quality of life (QL) instruments should account for potentially changing conceptualisations of QL as patients adapt to disease (response-shift). Most instruments do not do this, and some that do are relatively complicated and burdensome for patients. The extent to which patients reconceptualise QL is unknown, and it is unclear whether this additional complication is necessary. This paper reviews existing methods for assessing response-shift and introduces an alternative approach using multilevel models. The method is described using data from a cancer clinical trial, and its performance is evaluated in simulations. The models reveal substantial response-shift in these cancer patients. Simulations under the null hypothesis of zero response-shift confirm that the method performs correctly in terms of its risk of type I error, and further simulations illustrate its statistical power to detect pre-defined levels of response-shift. The method is a relatively simple extension of familiar multiple regression models and yields parameters with a simple interpretation, representing the changes in importance of QL domains over time. It can be applied to existing datasets collected with other analysis strategies in mind and may have application in the investigation of response shifts and other manifestations of adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1185
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Do retrospective and prospective quality of life assessments differ for pancreas-kidney transplant recipients? [J].
Adang, EMM ;
Kootstra, G ;
Engel, GL ;
van Hooff, JP ;
Merckelbach, HLGJ .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 11 (01) :11-15
[2]   The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds [J].
Albrecht, GL ;
Devlieger, PJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (08) :977-988
[3]  
ARMENAKIS A, 1992, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V37, P213
[4]   The influence of ill-health experience on the valuation of health [J].
Badia, X ;
Herdman, M ;
Kind, P .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (06) :687-696
[5]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[6]   Health related quality of life:: A changing construct? [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Lowy, A ;
Mathys, N ;
Herrmann, R ;
Hürny, C .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (07) :1187-1197
[7]   Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation:: an explorative investigation [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Lowy, A ;
Maibach, R ;
Hürny, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (14) :1729-1735
[8]   Quality of life as subjective experience:: Reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Hürny, C ;
Maibach, R ;
Herrmann, R ;
Laffer, U .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :775-782
[9]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[10]   Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey [J].
Brazier, J ;
Usherwood, T ;
Harper, R ;
Thomas, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1115-1128