Intramuscular aripiprazole for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with intramuscular haloperidol

被引:87
作者
Andrezina, Raisa
Josiassen, Richard C.
Marcus, Ronald N.
Oren, Dan A.
Manos, George
Stock, Elyse
Carson, William H.
Iwamoto, Taro
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Arthur P Noyes Res Fdn, Norristown, PA 19401 USA
[2] Riga Mental Hlth Care Ctr, Dept Psychiat, LV-1005 Riga, Latvia
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA
[4] Otsuka Amer Pharmaceut Inc, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[5] Otsuka Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018535, Japan
关键词
acute agitation; intramuscular antipsychotic therapy; intramuscular aripiprazole; Intramuscular haloperidol; efficacy; safety;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-006-0541-x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) aripiprazole and IM haloperidol for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Materials and methods Four-hundred and forty-eight patients were randomized (2:2:1 ratio) to IM aripiprazole 9.75 mg, IM haloperidol 6.5 mg, or IM placebo. Patients could receive up to three injections over the first 24 h, with second and third injections administered >= 2 and >= 4 h, respectively, after the first if deemed clinically necessary. Primary efficacy measure was mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PEC) score from baseline to 2 h. Results Mean improvement in PEC at 2 h was significantly greater for IM aripiprazole (-7.27) vs placebo (-4.78; p < 0.001); IM aripiprazole was noninferior to IM haloperidol (-7.75) on PEC. All secondary efficacy measures showed significantly greater improvements at 2 h for IM aripiprazole and IM haloperidol over placebo. Mean number of injections/patient and percentage of patients requiring benzodiazepines were significantly lower for IM aripiprazole vs placebo (p < 0.01). IM aripiprazole was well tolerated. Extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events were similar for aripiprazole (1.7%) and placebo (2.3%) and lower than with haloperidol (12.6%). Conclusion These results show that IM aripiprazole is an effective treatment, comparable to IM haloperidol, and well-tolerated for acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
[3]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[4]   Calming versus sedative effects of intramuscular olanzapine in agitated patients [J].
Battaglia, J ;
Lindborg, SR ;
Alaka, K ;
Meehan, K ;
Wright, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 21 (03) :192-198
[5]  
Beuzen JN, 2006, SCHIZOPHR RES, V81, P39
[6]   A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response comparison of intramuscular olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of acute agitation in schizophrenia [J].
Breier, A ;
Meehan, K ;
Birkett, M ;
David, S ;
Ferchland, I ;
Sutton, V ;
Taylor, CC ;
Palmer, R ;
Dossenbach, M ;
Kiesler, G ;
Brook, S ;
Wright, P .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 59 (05) :441-448
[7]   Ziprasidone and haloperidol in the treatment of acute exacerbation of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: comparison of intramuscular and oral formulations in a 6-week, randomized, blinded-assessment study [J].
Brook, S ;
Walden, J ;
Benattia, I ;
Siu, CO ;
Romano, SJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 178 (04) :514-523
[8]   FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE AGITATED BEHAVIOR SCALE [J].
CORRIGAN, JD ;
BOGNER, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 16 (03) :386-392
[9]   Pharmacological treatment of psychotic agitation [J].
Currier, GW ;
Trenton, A .
CNS DRUGS, 2002, 16 (04) :219-228
[10]   Intramuscular (IM) ziprasidone 20 mg is effective in reducing acute agitation associated with psychosis: a double-blind, randomized trial [J].
Daniel, DG ;
Potkin, SG ;
Reeves, KR ;
Swift, RH ;
Harrigan, EP .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 155 (02) :128-134