Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia

被引:35
作者
Khaldoun, E. [1 ]
Woisard, V. [2 ]
Verin, E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rouen Univ Hosp, Serv Physiol Digest Urinaire Resp & Sport, F-76031 Rouen, France
[2] Toulouse Univ Hosp, Hop Larrey, Serv Chirurg Cervicofaciale, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Rouen, EA 3830, GRHV, Rouen, France
来源
GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE | 2009年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
OUTCOMES TOOL; STROKE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
A quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire specifically designed for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (SWAL-QOL) has been elaborated and validated by Colleen McHorney. The aim of the present study was to validate the French translation of the SWAL-QOL in 73 patients with either post-stroke or post-surgical. oropharyngeal dysphagia. The French version was considered understandable and acceptable by the study patients, who completed the questionnaire in approximately 20 minutes. However, 32 patients needed help in fitting out the questionnaire-mostly in reading the questions and writing the answers. Completion was excellent, although seven patients missed one item. Analysis of convergent validity of the French version showed good correlation between items and the corresponding scale. Validity convergence was excellent for all the different items, with a correlation between each item and its own scale that was always greater than 0.40. Internal coherence was also excellent, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.7. Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia have a poor QOL, as reflected by their very low scores. The lowest scores were related to the impact of swallowing disorders on the QOL (47 +/- 30) and on mental health (51 +/- 3 1). This study also demonstrated the linguistic and psychometric validity of the French version of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire. (c) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 171
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[2]
AGA technical review on management of oropharyngeal dysphagia [J].
Cook, IJ ;
Kahrilas, PJ .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (02) :455-478
[3]
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P167
[4]
Cine magnetic resonance imaging with single-shot fast spin echo for evaluation of dysphagia and aspiration [J].
Hartl, Dana M. ;
Kolb, Frederic ;
Bretagne, Evelyne ;
Marandas, Patrick ;
Sigal, Robert .
DYSPHAGIA, 2006, 21 (03) :156-162
[5]
Accuracy of bedside clinical methods compared with fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in determining the risk of aspiration in acute stroke patients [J].
Lim, SHB ;
Lieu, PK ;
Phua, SY ;
Seshadri, R ;
Venketasubramanian, N ;
Lee, SH ;
Choo, PNJ .
DYSPHAGIA, 2001, 16 (01) :1-6
[6]
Lindgren S, 1991, Dysphagia, V6, P187
[7]
Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy [J].
Logemann, JA ;
Rademaker, AW ;
Pauloski, BR ;
Ohmae, Y ;
Kahrilas, PJ .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 1998, 50 (06) :311-319
[8]
Swallowing function after stroke - Prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months [J].
Mann, G ;
Hankey, GJ ;
Cameron, D .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (04) :744-748
[9]
The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling [J].
McHorney, CA ;
Bricker, DE ;
Robbins, J ;
Kramer, AE ;
Rosenbek, JC ;
Chignell, KA .
DYSPHAGIA, 2000, 15 (03) :122-133
[10]
The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity [J].
McHorney, CA ;
Robbins, J ;
Lomax, K ;
Rosenbek, JC ;
Chignell, K ;
Kramer, AE ;
Bricker, DE .
DYSPHAGIA, 2002, 17 (02) :97-114