Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure:: evidence from the CHARM programme

被引:49
作者
Hawkins, N. M.
Wang, D.
McMurray, J. J. V.
Pfeffer, M. A.
Swedberg, K.
Granger, C. B.
Yusuf, S.
Pocock, S. J.
Ostergren, J.
Michelson, E. L.
Dunn, F. G.
机构
[1] Stobhill Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Glasgow G21 3UW, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp Ostra, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[7] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[9] Karolinska Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[10] AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/hrt.2005.083949
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy ( ECG LVH) is a powerful independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension. Objective: To determine the contemporary prevalence and prognostic implications of ECG LVH in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure with and without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF). Methods and outcome: The Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity ( CHARM) programme randomised 7599 patients with symptomatic heart failure to receive candesartan or placebo. The primary outcome comprised cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure. The relative risk ( RR) conveyed by ECG LVH compared with a normal ECG was examined in a Cox model, adjusting for as many as 31 covariates of prognostic importance. Results: The prevalence of ECG LVH was similar in all three CHARM trials ( Alternative, 15.4%; Added, 17.1%; Preserved, 14.7%; Overall, 15.7%) despite a more frequent history of hypertension in CHARM-Preserved. ECG LVH was an independent predictor of worse prognosis in CHARM-Overall. RR for the primary outcome was 1.27 ( 95% confidence interval ( CI) 1.04 to 1.55, p = 0.018). The risk of secondary end points was also increased: cardiovascular death, 1.50 ( 95% CI 1.13 to 1.99, p = 0.005); hospitalisation due to heart failure, 1.19 ( 95% CI 0.94 to 1.50, p = 0.148); and composite major cardiovascular events, 1.35 ( 95% CI 1.12 to 1.62, p = 0.002). Conclusion: ECG LVH is similarly prevalent in patients with symptomatic heart failure regardless of LVEF. The simple clinical finding of ECG LVH was an independent predictor of a worse clinical outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure receiving extensive contemporary treatment. Candesartan had similar benefits in patients with and without ECG LVH.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PHYSIOLOGIC DETERMINANTS OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
GREEN, LH ;
GROSSMAN, W .
CIRCULATION, 1979, 60 (02) :386-396
[2]   A national survey of heart failure in French hospitals [J].
Cohen-Solal, A ;
Desnos, M ;
Delahaye, F ;
Emeriau, JP ;
Hanania, G .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (09) :763-769
[3]   RELATION BETWEEN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN MILD SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION (RESULTS TRAM TREATMENT AT MILD HYPERTENSION STUDY) [J].
CROW, RS ;
PRINEAS, RJ ;
RAUTAHARJU, P ;
HANNAN, P ;
LIEBSON, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 75 (17) :1233-1238
[4]   Comparative effects of candesartan and enalapril on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension: the candesartan assessment in the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy (CATCH) study [J].
Cuspidi, C ;
Muiesan, ML ;
Valagussa, L ;
Salvetti, M ;
Di Biagio, C ;
Agabiti-Rosei, E ;
Magnani, B ;
Zanchetti, A .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 (11) :2293-2300
[5]   Left ventricular hypertrophy and angiotensin II antagonists [J].
Dahlöf, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 14 (02) :174-182
[6]   LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY AND MORTALITY IN HYPERTENSION - AN ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM THE GLASGOW-BLOOD-PRESSURE-CLINIC [J].
DUNN, FG ;
MCLENACHAN, J ;
ISLES, CG ;
BROWN, I ;
DARGIE, HJ ;
LEVER, AF ;
LORIMER, AR ;
MURRAY, GD ;
PRINGLE, SD ;
ROBERTSON, JWK .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (08) :775-782
[7]  
Kannel W B, 1987, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, V10 Suppl 6, pS135, DOI 10.1097/00005344-198706106-00018
[8]   Differences between patients with a preserved and a depressed left ventricular function: a report from the EuroHeart Failure Survey [J].
Lenzen, MJ ;
Reimer, WJMSO ;
Boersma, E ;
Vantrimpont, PJMJ ;
Follath, F ;
Swedberg, K ;
Cleland, J ;
Komajda, M .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (14) :1214-1220
[9]   PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF BASE-LINE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND THEIR SERIAL CHANGES IN SUBJECTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY [J].
LEVY, D ;
SALOMON, M ;
DAGOSTINO, RB ;
BELANGER, AJ ;
KANNEL, WB .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) :1786-1793
[10]   TIMP-1 - A marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and fibrosis in hypertension [J].
Lindsay, MM ;
Maxwell, P ;
Dunn, FG .
HYPERTENSION, 2002, 40 (02) :136-141