Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD

被引:74
作者
Li, Wenxiang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Haopeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2017年 / 9卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carsharing; analytic hierarchy process; geographical information system; big data; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; LANDFILL SITE SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; PROCESS AHP; GIS; TRANSPORTATION; LOCATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su9010152
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carsharing is one of the effective ways to relieve the problems of traffic jams, parking difficulties, and air pollution. In recent years, the numbers of carsharing services and their members have remarkably increased around the world. The project of electric carsharing in Shanghai, called EVCARD, has also developed rapidly with very large demand and supply. Aiming to determine the optimal locations of future stations of the EVCARD, this research employs a novel method combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS) with big data. Potential users, potential travel demand, potential travel purposes, and distance from existing stations are selected as the decision criteria. A siting decision system is established, consisting of 15 evaluation indicators which are calculated from multi-source data on mobile phones, taxi trajectory, point of interests (POI), and the EVCARD operation. The method of the AHP is used to determine the indicator weights, and the "Spatial Analyst" tool of ArcGIS is adopted to generate the indicator values for every 1 km x 1 km decision unit. Finally, synthetic scores are calculated to evaluate the candidate sites of EVCARD stations. The results of the case study verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, which can provide a more scientific and feasible method for carsharing operators to site stations, avoiding aimless and random decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Performance Comparison of Reservation Based and Instant Access One-Way Car Sharing Service through Discrete Event Simulation
    Alfian, Ganjar
    Rhee, Jongtae
    Kang, Yong-Shin
    Yoon, Byungun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (09) : 12465 - 12489
  • [2] [Anonymous], TRANSP RES RECORD
  • [3] Awasthi Anjali, 2008, International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, V1, P66, DOI 10.1504/IJIDS.2008.020049
  • [4] Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems
    Awasthi, Anjali
    Chauhan, Satyaveer S.
    Omrani, Hichem
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) : 12270 - 12280
  • [5] A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach for Carsharing Stations Selection
    Awasthi, Anjali
    Breuil, Dominique
    Chauhan, Satyaveer Singh
    Parent, Michel
    Reveillere, Thierry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2007, 16 (01) : 57 - 78
  • [6] An optimization framework for the development of efficient one-way car-sharing systems
    Boyaci, Burak
    Zografos, Konstantinos G.
    Geroliminis, Nikolas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (03) : 718 - 733
  • [7] Analytic Hierarchy Process and Geographic Information Systems to Identify Optimal Transit Alignments
    Brunner, I. Made
    Kim, Karl
    Yamashita, Eric
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2215) : 59 - 66
  • [8] Cervero R., 2006, 200607 U CAL BERK I
  • [9] GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review
    Chandio, Imtiaz Ahmed
    Matori, Abd Nasir B.
    WanYusof, Khamaruzaman B.
    Talpur, Mir Aftab Hussain
    Balogun, Abdul-Lateef
    Lawal, Dano Umar
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (08) : 3059 - 3066
  • [10] Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Parvathinathan, G.
    Breeden, Jeff B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 87 (01) : 139 - 153