Is safety a subject for science?

被引：119

作者：

Hollnagel, Erik ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

[2] Reg Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark

来源：

SAFETY SCIENCE | 2014年 / 67卷

关键词：

Foundations; Scientific subject; Epiphenomenon; Non-event; Social construct;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

In this paper I will not so much address the status of safety science as a science, but rather address the status or meaning of safety. So instead of entering into a discussion of whether safety science is a proper science - whatever that means - the focus will be on whether the notion of safety itself is a proper subject for scientific investigation or indeed whether safety as such is an appropriate topic or subject for a scientific discipline. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：21 / 24

页数：4

共 18 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1992, ENG IS HUMAN

[2] HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS - WHERE SHOULDST THOU TURN [J].

DOUGHERTY, EM .

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1990, 29 (03) :283-299

[3] The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research [J].

Guldenmund, FW .

SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 34 (1-3) :215-257

[4] Management and culture: The third age of safety. A review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and environment [J].

Hale, AR ;

Hovden, J .

OCCUPATIONAL INJURY: RISK, PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION, 1998, :129-165

[5]

Heinrich H.W., 1929, TRAVELERS STANDARD, V1, P1

[6]

Hollnagel E., 2013, Nuclear Safety and Simulation, V4, P1

[7]

Hollnagel E., 2011, RESILIENCE ENG PRACT

[8]

Hollnagel E., 2001, 4 INT WORKSH HUM ERR

[9]

Hollnagel E., 2010, SAFER COMPLEX IND EN, DOI 10.1201/9781420092493

[10]

Kuhn Thomas., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions

← 1 2 →