The use of a modified Delphi procedure for the determination of 26 prognostic factors in the sub-acute stage of stroke

被引:25
作者
Meijer, R
Ihnenfeldt, D
Vermeulen, M
De Haan, R
Van Limbeek, J
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Sint Maartensklin Nijmegen, Dept Rehabil Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Sint Maartensklin Nijmegen, SMK Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Delphi procedure; prognostic factors; stroke;
D O I
10.1097/00004356-200312000-00003
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to reach consensus about the prognostic factors when deciding the discharge destination from a hospital stroke unit, and to construct a prognostic conceptual framework. To realise an optimal integration of knowledge from research findings and from clinical experience by expert opinions we used a 'modified Delphi Technique; which is the most commonly used method for the production of clinical guidelines. The process yielded 26 prognostic factors, which were arranged in clinical and social sub-domains. The sub-domains and the factors within each sub-domain were prioritised according to their assumed predictive value for the decision process. The order of importance of the prognostic factors in the clinical domain was: (1) disabilities, (2) pre-morbid disabilities, (3) impairments and (4) disease/biology; and the order of importance of the factors in the social domain was: (1) home front, (2) social situation and (3) residence. The Delphi procedure is an excellent instrument to determine and prioritise prognostic factors. With this procedure research-based and consensus-based knowledge can be combined. For a valid procedure it is mandatory to state explicitly in advance how the scores will be judged, and to explain the scientific level of the evidence during the whole procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 270
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BARER DH, 1989, Q J MED, V70, P27
[2]  
BERNSTEIN SJ, 1992, CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
[3]  
BLACK N, 1998, HLTH SERVICES RES ME, P199
[4]   A METHODOLOGICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ON PROGNOSIS AFTER TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACKS [J].
KERNAN, WN ;
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
BRASS, LM .
STROKE, 1991, 22 (09) :1108-1116
[5]   Prognostic factors in the subacute phase after stroke for the future residence after six months to one year. A systematic review of the literature [J].
Meijer, R ;
Ihnenfeldt, DS ;
van Limbeek, J ;
Vermeulen, M ;
de Haan, RJ .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (05) :512-520
[6]   Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature [J].
Meijer, R ;
Ihnenfeldt, DS ;
de Groot, IJM ;
van Limbeek, J ;
Vermeulen, M ;
de Haan, RJ .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (02) :119-129
[7]  
MEIJER R, 2004, IN PRESS DISABILITY
[8]  
MULROW CD, 1999, COCHRANE COLLABORATI
[9]  
Murphy MK, 1998, Health Technol Assess, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3310/HTA2030, 10.3310/hta2030]
[10]  
Richardson F M, 1972, Med Care, V10, P29, DOI 10.1097/00005650-197201000-00004