Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR

被引:483
作者
Fleige, Simone
Walf, Vanessa
Huch, Silvia
Prgomet, Christian
Sehm, Julia
Pfaffl, Michael W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, ZIEL, Ctr Life & Food Sci, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[2] TATAA Bioctr Germany, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
gene expression study; Ct; mRNA; qRT-PCR; real-time RT-PCR; RNA integrity; RNA integrity number (RIN);
D O I
10.1007/s10529-006-9127-2
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Relative quantification in quantitative real-time RT-PCR is increasingly used to quantify gene expression changes. In general, two different relative mRNA quantification models exist: the delta-delta Ct and the efficiency-corrected Ct model. Both models have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of simplification on the one hand and efficiency correction on the other. The particular problem of RNA integrity and its effect on relative quantification in qRT-PCR performance was tested in different bovine tissues and cell lines (n = 11). Therefore different artificial and standardized RNA degradation levels were used. Currently fully automated capillary electrophoresis systems have become the new standard in RNA quality assessment. RNA quality was rated according the RNA integrity number (RIN). Furthermore, the effect of different length of amplified products and RNA integrity on expression analyses was investigated. We found significant impact of RNA integrity on relative expression results, mainly on cycle threshold (Ct) values and a minor effect on PCR efficiency. To minimize the interference of RNA integrity on relative quantification models, we can recommend to normalize gene expression by an internal reference gene and to perform an efficiency correction. Results demonstrate that innovative new quantification methods and normalization models can improve future mRNA quantification.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1613
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Chipping away at the chip bias: RNA degradation in microarray analysis [J].
Auer, H ;
Lyianarachchi, S ;
Newsom, D ;
Klisovic, MI ;
Marcucci, U ;
Kornacker, K .
NATURE GENETICS, 2003, 35 (04) :292-293
[2]   High quality RNA isolation from tumours with low cellularity and high extracellular matrix component for cDNA microarrays:: application to chondrosarcoma [J].
Baelde, HJ ;
Cleton-Jansen, AM ;
van Beerendonk, H ;
Namba, M ;
Bovée, JVMG ;
Hogendoorn, PCW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (10) :778-782
[3]   Quantitative real-time RT-PCR - a perspective [J].
Bustin, SA ;
Benes, V ;
Nolan, T ;
Pfaffl, MW .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 34 (03) :597-601
[4]  
Bustin Stephen A, 2004, J Biomol Tech, V15, P155
[5]  
Fleige Simone, 2006, Molecular Aspects of Medicine, V27, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.003
[6]  
Gottwald E, 2001, ELECTROPHORESIS, V22, P4016, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(200110)22:18<4016::AID-ELPS4016>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-9
[8]   Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces [J].
Imbeaud, S ;
Graudens, E ;
Boulanger, V ;
Barlet, X ;
Zaborski, P ;
Eveno, E ;
Mueller, O ;
Schroeder, A ;
Auffray, C .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (06) :1-12
[9]   RNA is more UV resistant than DNA: The formation of UV-induced DNA lesions is strongly sequence and conformation dependent [J].
Kundu, LM ;
Linne, U ;
Marahiel, M ;
Carell, T .
CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, 2004, 10 (22) :5697-5705
[10]  
LIGHTFOOD S, 2002, 59887650EN AG TECHN