Measuring factor adjustment costs

被引:105
作者
Hall, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Hoover Inst War Revolut & Peace, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1162/0033553041502135
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I estimate adjustment costs for labor and capital from the Euler equations for factor demand. For both factors, I find relatively strong evidence against substantial adjustment costs. My estimates use annual data from two-digit industries. My results support the view that rents arising from adjustment costs are relatively small and are not an important part of the explanation of the large movements of the values of corporations in relation to the reproduction costs of their capital. I investigate the potential effects of three types of specification error: ( 1) aggregation over time, ( 2) aggregation over firms with heterogeneous demand shocks, and ( 3) estimation of a convex adjustment-cost technology in the presence of nonconvex discrete adjustment costs. I find that the likely biases from these specification errors are relatively small.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 927
页数:29
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ABEL AB, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1369
[2]   Explaining investment dynamics in US manufacturing:: A generalized (S,s) approach [J].
Caballero, RJ ;
Engel, EMRA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (04) :783-826
[3]  
CABALLERO RJ, 1999, HDB MACROECONOMICS, P816
[4]   MENU COSTS AND THE NEUTRALITY OF MONEY [J].
CAPLIN, AS ;
SPULBER, DF .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (04) :703-725
[5]  
CHIRINKO RS, 2002, ELUSIVE ELASTICITY L
[6]  
COOPER R, 2000, 7925 NBER
[7]  
Garber Peter M., 1983, 31 NBER
[8]   Interview with Lars Peter Hansen [J].
Ghysels, E ;
Hall, A ;
Hansen, LP .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2002, 20 (04) :442-447
[9]   Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment [J].
Gilchrist, S ;
Himmelberg, CP .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1995, 36 (03) :541-572
[10]   The stock market and capital accumulation [J].
Hall, RE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1185-1202