Cancer incidence in The Health Improvement Network

被引:59
作者
Haynes, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Forde, Kimberly A. [2 ]
Schinnar, Rita [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Patricia [4 ]
Strom, Brian L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lewis, James D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Educ & Res Therapeut, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
cancer; incidence; epidemiology;
D O I
10.1002/pds.1774
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The utility of electronic medical record databases for clinical research relies on the validity and completeness of the recorded medical diagnoses. This study assessed whether the recorded incidence of cancer among patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database is comparable to that expected in the UK based on national cancer registry data. Methods We examined incidence rates of any cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer and the specific cancers colorectal, lung, pancreas, and lymphoma from 1992 to 2007. Indirect standardization was used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIR) using age- and sex-specific rates from the UK cancer registry for England and Wales for the corresponding years. Results Recording of the incidence of all cancers combined in THIN was very close to the expected rates from 2001 to 2007, that is, SIR within 10% of unity. Recording of the solid cancers was less than the expected based on cancer registry data, but with SIRs > 0.80 in 2007 for each cancer. Recording of lymphoma was close to the expected rate for the entire follow-up period. Time and experience with Vision software emerged as important factors in reported incidence rates for all cancers. Conclusions For all cancers combined and for lymphoma the observed rates in THIN are very close to those reported in cancer registry data for the years 2001-2007. However, for solid cancers the observed rates in THIN are below those reported in cancer registry data. This may reflect the use of non-specific codes to record solid cancers. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 736
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Which general practices have higher list inflation? An exploratory study [J].
Ashworth, M ;
Jenkins, M ;
Burgess, K ;
Keynes, H ;
Wallace, M ;
Roberts, D ;
Majeed, A .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 22 (05) :529-531
[2]   Separation of individual-level and cluster-level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data [J].
Begg, MD ;
Parides, MK .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (16) :2591-2602
[3]  
Fitzmaurice G., 2004, Applied longitudinal analysis
[4]  
*GREAT BRIT OFF NA, 1998, CANC STAT REG REG CA
[5]   Validation of death and suicide recording on the THIN UK primary care database [J].
Hall, Gillian C. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 (02) :120-131
[6]   The relationship between time since registration and measured incidence rates in the General Practice Research Database [J].
Lewis, JD ;
Bilker, WB ;
Weinstein, RB ;
Strom, BL .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (07) :443-451
[7]  
LEWIS JD, 2007, DRUG SAFETY, V16, P393
[8]   The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care [J].
Maguire, Andrew ;
Blak, Betina T. ;
Thompson, Mary .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 (01) :76-83
[9]  
Westlake Susan, 2008, Health Stat Q, P33