Comparison of particle light scattering and fine particulate matter mass in central California

被引:39
作者
Chow, JC [1 ]
Watson, JG
Park, K
Lowenthal, DH
Robinson, NF
Park, K
Magliano, KA
机构
[1] Desert Res Inst, Reno, NV USA
[2] Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol, Kwangju, South Korea
[3] Calif Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2006.10464515
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Particle light scattering (B-sp) from nephelometers and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) mass determined by filter samplers are compared for summer and winter at 35 locations in and around California's San Joaquin Valley from December 2, 1999 to February 3, 2001. The relationship is described using particle mass scattering efficiency (sigma(sp)) derived from linear regression of B-sp on PM2.5 that can be applied to estimated PM2.5 from nephelometer data within the 24-hr filter sampling periods and between the every-6th-day sampling frequency. An average of sigma(sp) = 4.9 m(2)/g was found for all of the sites and seasons; however, sigma(sp) averaged by site type and season provided better PM2.5 estimates. On average, the sigma(sp) was lower in summer than winter, consistent with lower relative humidities, lower fractions of hygroscopic ammonium nitrate, and higher contributions from fugitive dust. Winter average sigma(sp) were similar at non-source-dominated sites, ranging from 4.8 m(2)/g to 5.9 m(2)/g. The sigma(sp) was 2.3 m(2)/g at the roadside, 3.7 m(2)/g at a dairy farm, and 4.1 m(2)/g in the Kern County oilfields. Comparison of B-sp from nephelometers with and without a PM2.5 inlet at the Fresno Supersite showed that coarse particles contributed minor amounts to light scattering. This was confirmed by poorer correlations between B-sp and coarse particulate matter measured during a fall sampling period.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 410
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AHLQUIST NORMAN C, 1967, J AIR POLLUT CONTR ASS, V17, P467
[2]  
ALCORN SH, 2004, STI90232102644
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, FIELD PROGRAM PLAN C
[4]   Performance evaluation of the portable MiniVOL particulate matter sampler [J].
Baldauf, RW ;
Lane, DD ;
Marotz, GA ;
Wiener, RW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (35) :6087-6091
[5]   INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF THE VISUAL RANGE [J].
BEUTTELL, RG ;
BREWER, AW .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS AND OF PHYSICS IN INDUSTRY, 1949, 26 (11) :357-359
[6]  
BRAUER M, 1995, J EXPO ANAL ENV EPID, V5, P45
[7]   ON GENERALITY OF CORRELATION OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATION AND LIGHT SCATTER [J].
CHARLSON, RJ ;
AHLQUIST, NC ;
HORVATH, H .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1968, 2 (05) :455-&
[8]   PM10 SOURCE APPORTIONMENT IN CALIFORNIA SAN-JOAQUIN VALLEY [J].
CHOW, JC ;
WATSON, JG ;
LOWENTHAL, DH ;
SOLOMON, PA ;
MAGLIANO, KL ;
ZIMAN, SD ;
RICHARDS, LW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (18) :3335-3354
[9]   Descriptive analysis of PM(2.5) and PM(10) at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lu, ZQ ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Frazier, CA ;
Solomon, PA ;
Thuillier, RH ;
Magliano, K .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (12) :2079-2112
[10]   Comparability between PM2.5 and particle light scattering measurements [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Richards, LW .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 79 (01) :29-45