Examination of multidrug resistance in cell lines and primary breast tumours by flow cytometry

被引:16
作者
Brotherick, I
Shenton, BK
Egan, M
Cunliffe, WE
Browell, DA
Lunt, LG
Young, JR
Higgs, MJ
机构
[1] QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,GATESHEAD,ENGLAND
[2] QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSP,DEPT SURG,GATESHEAD,ENGLAND
[3] QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,GATESHEAD,ENGLAND
关键词
flow cytometry; multidrug resistance; breast; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00344-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to measure multidrug resistance (MDR) by flow cytometry and quantify the expression of beta-glycoprotein (using antibody) glutathione transferase (using alpha-GSTpi antibody) in alpha-JSB-1 and alpha-GSTpi of a series of cell lines and primary breast cancers, and to assess the relationship between these MDR proteins and a selection of oncogene and prognostic markers in breast cancer. Flow cytometry was performed using permeabilised cells stained with fluorescent antibodies using well-established methods. Antibody staining was confirmed for JSB1, but not GSTpi by use of known positive and negative controls. No correlation was seen when comparing the number of molecules of alpha-JSB-1 with alpha-GSTpi (P = 0.1, r(2) = 0.4, n = 14) using a selection of cell lines. Examination of 45 breast tumours for expression of JSB-1 and GSTpi revealed a significant association between these two antibodies (P < 0.00001, r(2) = 0.5, n = 45). On examining the breast tumours, alpha-JSB-1 showed a positive association with c-erbB-2 (P = 0.003), c-myc (P = 0.0004) and c-jun (P = 0.02) but not ER or EGF-R expression. alpha-GSTpi showed a positive association with c-erbB-2 (P = 0.03) and c-myc (P = 0.0004) but not ER, EGF-R or c-jun. Flow cytometric MDR levels were not related to tumour grade or axillary node status. In solid tumours, a relationship between the two antibodies used has been clearly demonstrated, however, specificity of alpha-GSTpi is questioned. Both antibodies show an association with c-erbB-2, which is associated with poor prognosis and with c-myc which is involved in cell cycling and differentiation. Monitoring MDR markers (Pgp) using this methodology may be useful for evaluation of prognosis in breast cancer. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:2334 / 2341
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] AMPLIFICATION OF C-ERBB-2 AND AGGRESSIVE HUMAN-BREAST TUMORS
    ALI, IU
    CAMPBELL, G
    LIDEREAU, R
    CALLAHAN, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1988, 240 (4860) : 1795 - 1796
  • [2] USE OF THE BIOTINYLATED ANTIBODY DAKO-ER 1D5 TO MEASURE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR ON CYTOKERATIN POSITIVE CELLS OBTAINED FROM PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER CELLS
    BROTHERICK, I
    LENNARD, TWJ
    COOK, S
    JOHNSTONE, R
    ANGUS, B
    WINTHEREIK, MP
    SHENTON, BK
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1995, 20 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [3] FLOW CYTOMETRIC METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR AND COMPARISON WITH THE RADIO-LIGAND BINDING ASSAY
    BROTHERICK, I
    LENNARD, TWJ
    WILKINSON, SE
    COOK, S
    ANGUS, B
    SHENTON, BK
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1994, 16 (03): : 262 - 269
  • [4] ARE FINE-NEEDLE BREAST ASPIRATES REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNDERLYING SOLID TUMOR - A COMPARISON OF RECEPTOR LEVELS, PLOIDY AND THE INFLUENCE OF CYTOKERATIN GATES
    BROTHERICK, I
    SHENTON, BK
    LENNARD, TWJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 72 (03) : 732 - 737
  • [5] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES IN PRIMARY HUMAN BREAST CARCINOMAS
    CAIRNS, J
    WRIGHT, C
    CATTAN, AR
    HALL, AG
    CANTWELL, BJ
    HARRIS, AL
    HORNE, CHW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1992, 166 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [6] CORNWELL MM, 1987, J BIOL CHEM, V262, P2166
  • [7] Dalton William S., 1994, Current Opinion in Oncology, V6, P595, DOI 10.1097/00001622-199411000-00011
  • [8] DALTON WS, 1993, J NATL CANCER I, V83, P80
  • [9] DALTON WS, 1993, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC, P2655
  • [10] P-GLYCOPROTEIN EXPRESSION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
    DIXON, AR
    BELL, J
    ELLIS, IO
    ELSTON, CW
    BLAMEY, RW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 66 (03) : 537 - 541