PELTI: Measuring the passing efficiency of an airborne low turbulence aerosol inlet

被引:40
作者
Huebert, BJ
Howell, SG
Covert, D
Bertram, T
Clarke, A
Anderson, JR
Lafleur, BG
Seebaugh, WR
Wilson, JC
Gesler, D
Blomquist, B
Fox, J
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Dept Oceanog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ USA
[4] Univ Denver, Dept Engn, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[5] NCAR, Design & Fabricat Serv, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/027868290500823
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In an effort to improve the accuracy of airborne aerosol studies, we compared a new porous-diffuser low-turbulence inlet (LTI) with three other inlets on the NSF/NCAR C-130, using both dust and sea salt as test aerosols. Analysis of bulk filters behind the LTI and an external reference total aerosol sampler (TAS) found no significant differences, while both the NASA shrouded solid diffuser inlet (SD) and NCAR community aerosol inlet (CAI) passed smaller amounts. However, scanning electron microscopic analyses of particles behind the LTI and TAS confirmed the model prediction that the LTI porous diffuser (PD) enhanced 7 mum particle concentrations by about 60%. Aerodynamic particle size distributions behind the other inlets began to diverge from enhancement-corrected LTI values above 2 mum, with mass concentrations of larger particles lower by as much as a factor of ten behind the CAI and a factor of 2 behind the SD. We conclude that the corrected LTI distributions were closer to ambient values than those from either the CAI or the SD. Since tubing losses contributed the most uncertainty when deducing ambient supermicron size distributions from LTI data, minimizing them should be a high priority for future experiments. Measured transfer tubing losses were larger than model estimates, in part because of some complex pieces for which no suitable model exists. The LTI represents a significant advance in our ability to sample populations of large particles from aircraft. A necessary part of using an LTI is the calculation of and correction for large-particle enhancement using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program. Although the solid diffuser inlet performed well under some conditions, its large-particle efficiency cannot be modeled, varies with humidity and particle morphology, and involves wall contact that has the potential to modify some particles.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 826
页数:24
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TSI AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER - THE EFFECT OF DENSITY ON RESPONSE [J].
ANANTH, G ;
WILSON, JC .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 9 (03) :189-199
[2]   Characterization of the Bermuda tropospheric aerosol by combined individual-particle and bulk-aerosol analysis [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Buseck, PR ;
Patterson, TL ;
Arimoto, R .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (02) :319-338
[3]   Variability of aerosol optical properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia [J].
Anderson, TL ;
Masonis, SJ ;
Covert, DS ;
Ahlquist, NC ;
Howell, SG ;
Clarke, AD ;
McNaughton, CS .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D23)
[4]   Marine sulfur cycling and the atmospheric aerosol over the springtime North Atlantic [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Andreae, TW ;
Meyerdierks, D ;
Thiel, C .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2003, 52 (08) :1321-1343
[5]   Concentration measurement and counting efficiency for the aerodynamic particle sizer 3320 [J].
Armendariz, AJ ;
Leith, D .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (01) :133-148
[6]  
BARON P, 2001, AEROSOL CALCULATOR
[7]   International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) project's first aerosol characterization experiment (ACE 1): Overview [J].
Bates, TS ;
Huebert, BJ ;
Gras, JL ;
Griffiths, FB ;
Durkee, PA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D13) :16297-16318
[8]   THE AIRBORNE AEROSOL INLET WORKSHOP - MEETING REPORT [J].
BAUMGARDNER, D ;
HUEBERT, B .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1993, 24 (06) :835-846
[9]  
BAUMGARDNER D, 1991, M REV AIRB AER INL W
[10]  
Blomquist BW, 2001, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V18, P1387, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1387:AEOTCA>2.0.CO