Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: Recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference

被引:2194
作者
Roach, Mack, III
Hanks, Gerald
Thames, Howard, Jr.
Schellhammer, Paul
Shipley, William U.
Sokol, Gerald H.
Sandler, Howard
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Urol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] US FDA, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 65卷 / 04期
关键词
biochemical recurrence; prostate cancer; radiotherapy; PSA failure;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 1996 the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) sponsored a Consensus Conference to establish a definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The ASTRO definition defined prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure as occurring after three consecutive PSA rises after a nadir with the date of failure as the point halfway between the nadir date and the first rise or any rise great enough to provoke initiation of therapy. This definition was not linked to clinical progression or survival; it performed poorly in patients undergoing hormonal therapy (HT), and backdating biased the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival. A second Consensus Conference was sponsored by ASTRO and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 21, 2005, to revise the ASTRO definition. The panel recommended: (1) a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA be considered the standard definition for biochemical failure after EBRT with or without HT; (2) the date of failure be determined "at call" (not backdated). They recommended that investigators be allowed to use the ASTRO Consensus Definition after EBRT alone (no hormonal therapy) with strict adherence to guidelines as to "adequate follow-up." To avoid the artifacts resulting from short follow-up, the reported date of control should be listed as 2 years short of the median follow-up. For example, if the median follow-up is 5 years, control rates at 3 years should be cited. Retaining a strict version of the ASTRO definition would allow comparisons with a large existing body of literature. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 974
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: What is the most appropriate cut point?
    Amling, CL
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Blute, ML
    Slezak, JM
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) : 1146 - 1151
  • [2] Failure free survival following brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer: comparison with external beam radiotherapy
    Beyer, DC
    Brachman, DG
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 57 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [3] Biochemical failure and the temporal kinetics of prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy with androgen deprivation
    Buyyounouski, MK
    Hanlon, AL
    Horwitz, EM
    Uzzo, RG
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05): : 1291 - 1298
  • [4] MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SERUM AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    CATALONA, WJ
    SMITH, DS
    RATLIFF, TL
    DODDS, KM
    COPLEN, DE
    YUAN, JJJ
    PETROS, JA
    ANDRIOLE, GL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (17) : 1156 - 1161
  • [5] Cavanagh W, 2000, Semin Urol Oncol, V18, P160
  • [6] Caution in interpreting biochemical control rates after treatment for prostate cancer: Length of follow-up influences results
    Connell, PP
    Ignacio, L
    McBride, RB
    Weichselbaum, RR
    Vijayakumar, S
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (05) : 875 - 879
  • [7] Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
  • [8] Prostate specific antigen bounce after radioactive seed implantation followed by external beam radiation for prostate cancer
    Critz, FA
    Williams, WH
    Benton, JB
    Levinson, AK
    Holladay, CT
    Holladay, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) : 1085 - 1089
  • [9] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Cote, K
    Loffredo, M
    Schultz, D
    Chen, MH
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Wein, A
    Richie, JP
    [J]. CANCER, 2002, 95 (02) : 281 - 286
  • [10] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974