Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services -: Methods

被引:455
作者
Briss, PA
Zaza, S
Pappaioanou, M
Fielding, J
Wright-De Agüero, L
Truman, BI
Hopkins, DP
Mullen, PD
Thompson, RS
Woolf, SH
Carande-Kulis, VG
Anderson, L
Hinman, AR
McQueen, DV
Teutsch, SM
Harris, JR
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Community Prevent Serv Guide Dev Activ, Div Prevent Res & Analyt Methods, Epidemiol Program Off, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] CDC, Off Global Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[3] Los Angeles Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Texas, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[5] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Dept Prevent Care, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ Med Coll Virginia, Fairfax, VA USA
[7] Task Force Child Survival & Dev, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] CDC, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[9] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
关键词
community health services; decision making; evidence-based medicine; systematic reviews; methods; population-based interventions; practice guidelines; preventive health services; public health practice; task force;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00119-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews and evidence-based recommendations are increasingly important for decision making in health and medicine. Over the past 20 years, information on the science of synthesizing research results has exploded. However, some approaches to systematic reviews of the effectiveness of clinical preventive services and medical care may be less appropriate for evaluating population-based interventions Furthermore, methods for linking evidence to recommendations are less well developed than methods for synthesizing evidence. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) will evaluate and make recommendations on population-based and public health interventions. This paper provides an overview of the Guide's process to systematically review evidence and translate that evidence into recommendations. The Guide reviews evidence on effectiveness, the applicability of effectiveness data, (i.e., the extent to which available effectiveness data is thought to apply to additional populations and settings), the intervention's other effects (i.e., important side effects), economic impact, and barriers to implementation of interventions. The steps for obtaining and evaluating evidence into recommendations involve: (1) forming multidisciplinary chapter development teams, (2) developing a conceptual approach to organizing, grouping, selecting and evaluating the interventions in each chapter; (3) selecting interventions to be evaluated; (4) searching for and retrieving evidence; (5) assessing the quality of and summarizing the body of evidence of effectiveness; (6) translating the body of evidence of effectiveness into recommendations; (7) considering information on evidence other than effectiveness; and (8) identifying and summarizing research gaps. Systematic reviews of and evidence-based recommendations for population-health interventions are challenging and methods will continue to evolve. However, using an evidence-based approach to identify and recommend effective interventions directed at specific public health goals may reduce errors in how information is collected and interpreted, identify important gaps in current knowledge thus guiding further research, and enhance the Guide users' ability to assess whether recommendations are valid and prudent from their own perspectives. Over time, all of these advantages could help to increase agreement regarding appropriate community health strategies and help to increase their implementation. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): community health services, decision making; evidence based medicine; systematic reviews; methods; population-based interventions; practice guidelines; preventive health services; public health practice; task force (C) 2000 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AG HLTH CAR POL R, 1998, EV BAS PRACT CTR OV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MMWR Recomm Rep, V48, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE LIB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV
[5]   Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults [J].
Briss, PA ;
Rodewald, LE ;
Hinman, AR ;
Shefer, AM ;
Strikas, RA ;
Bernier, RR ;
Carande-Kulis, VG ;
Yusuf, HR ;
Ndiaye, SM ;
Williams, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) :97-140
[6]  
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, 1994, CAN GUID CLIN PREV H
[7]   Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services [J].
Carande-Kulis, VG ;
Maciosek, MV ;
Briss, PA ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Zaza, S ;
Truman, BI ;
Messonnier, ML ;
Pappaioanou, M ;
Harris, JR ;
Fielding, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) :75-91
[8]  
*CDCP, 1996, CDC GUID IMPR QUAL
[9]  
*COCHR COLL, 1999, COCHR DAT SYST REV, V2
[10]  
Cooper H., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, V1st