Transport and fate of nitrate in headwater agricultural streams in Illinois

被引:250
作者
Royer, TV
Tank, JL
David, MB
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Sci Biol, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2004.1296
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrogen inputs to the Gulf of Mexico have increased during recent decades and agricultural regions in the upper Midwest, such as those in Illinois, are a major source of N to the Mississippi River. How strongly denitrification affects the transport of nitrate (NO3-N) in Illinois streams has not been directly assessed. We used the nutrient spiraling model to assess the role of in-stream denitrification in affecting the concentration and downstream transport of NO3-N in five headwater streams in agricultural areas of east-central Illinois. Denitnification in stream sediments was measured approximately monthly from April 2001 through January 2002. Denitrification rates tended to be high (up to 15 mg N m(-2) h(-1)), but the concentration of NO3-N in the streams was also high (>7 mg N L-1). Uptake velocities for NO3-N (uptake rate/concentration) were lower than reported for undisturbed streams, indicating that denitrification was not an efficient N sink relative to the concentration of NO3-N in the water column. Denitrification uptake lengths (the average distance NO3-N travels before being denitrified) were long and indicated that denitrification in the streambed did not affect the transport of NO3-N. Loss rates for NO3-N in the streams were <5% d(-1) except during periods of low discharge and low NO3-N concentration, which occurred only in late summer and early autumn. Annually, most NO3-N in these headwater sites appeared to be exported to downstream water bodies rather than denitrified, suggesting previous estimates of N losses through in-stream denitrification may have been overestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1304
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico [J].
Alexander, RB ;
Smith, RA ;
Schwarz, GE .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6771) :758-761
[2]  
*AM PUB HLTH ADM, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]   Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture [J].
Boesch, DF ;
Brinsfield, RB ;
Magnien, RE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) :303-320
[4]   Anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus and riverine export for Illinois, USA [J].
David, MB ;
Gentry, LE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (02) :494-508
[5]   Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed [J].
David, MB ;
Gentry, LE ;
Kovacic, DA ;
Smith, KM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (04) :1038-1048
[6]   Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in two Idaho (USA) headwater wilderness streams [J].
Davis, JC ;
Minshall, GW .
OECOLOGIA, 1999, 119 (02) :247-255
[7]   Overview of hypoxia around the world [J].
Diaz, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) :275-281
[8]   Quantification of the nitrogen cycle in a prairie stream [J].
Dodds, WK ;
Evans-White, MA ;
Gerlanc, NM ;
Gray, L ;
Gudder, DA ;
Kemp, MJ ;
López, AL ;
Stagliano, D ;
Strauss, EA ;
Tank, JL ;
Whiles, MR ;
Wollheim, WM .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (06) :574-589
[9]   Denitrification in river sediments: relationship between process rate and properties of water and sediment [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, R ;
Pattinson, SN ;
Whitton, BA .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1998, 39 (03) :467-476
[10]  
Goolsby D.A., 1999, DECISION ANAL SER, V17