The importance of patient autonomy at birth

被引:21
作者
Brooks, H
Sullivan, WJ
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leicester, NHS Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Guild Yule Sullivan Yule Truscott & Slivinski Bar, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1054/ijoa.2002.0958
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
It has always been recognised that the practice of medicine requires an ethical base. This ethical base also provides a backbone for a legal framework. Until recently paternalism was the accepted norm in the physician-patient relationship. Based on knowledge and experience the physician decided what treatment was in the best interests of the patient. However, in recent years medicine has changed from a predominantly paternalistic profession to one that is more patient centred. The physician informs and advises the patient but it is the patient who makes the decision. This is reflected in the change to principle-based medical ethics. The central concept in principle-based medical ethics is patient autonomy. This paper explores the application of autonomy and the legal requirement of informed consent to the clinical practice of obstetric anaesthesia. Autonomy requires that a patient has capacity to make a decision. Whether labouring women have capacity is discussed. There are times when patients are not able to act autonomously and the roles of advance directives (which can include birth plans) and substitute decision makers become important. The application of ethical practice to research in obstetric anaesthesia is considered. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 203
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia [J].
Affleck, PJ ;
Waisel, DB ;
Cusick, JM ;
Van Decar, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1998, 10 (02) :141-144
[2]  
*ASS AN GREAT BRIT, 1998, GUID OBST AN SERV, P1
[3]  
*ASS AN GREAT BRIT, 1999, INF CONS AN, P4
[4]  
Childress JF., 2001, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[5]   Labor epidural analgesia: back to the dark ages or a potential win-win situation [J].
Cohen, SE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1999, 8 (04) :223-225
[6]  
*COUNC EUR, 1996, COUNC EUR CONV HUM R, pCH2
[7]  
Daar AS, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V164, P60
[8]  
*DEN CAN, 1995, LIFE DEATH REP SPEC, P44
[9]  
Departemen Kesehatan RI, 2001, REF GUID CONS EX TRE, V8, p[15, 23, 30]
[10]   Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research Factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate [J].
Dorantes, DM ;
Tait, AR ;
Naughton, NN .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (02) :369-373