Factors that explain how policy makers distribute resources to mental health services

被引:77
作者
Corrigan, PW [1 ]
Watson, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Psychiat Rehabil, Tinley Pk, IL 60477 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1176/appi.ps.54.4.501
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Advocates hope to influence the resource allocation decisions of legislators and other policy makers to capture more resources for mental health programs. Findings from social psychological research suggest factors that, if pursued, may improve advocacy efforts. In particular, allocation decisions are affected by policy makers' perceptions of the scarcity of resources, effectiveness of specific programs, needs of people who have problems that are served by these programs, and extent of personal responsibility for these problems. These perceptions are further influenced by political ideology. Conservatives are motivated by a tendency to punish persons who. are perceived as having personal responsibility for their problems by withholding resources, whereas liberals are likely to avoid tough allocation decisions. Moreover, these perceptions are affected by political accountability, that is, whether politicians perceive that their constituents will closely monitor their decisions. just as the quality of clinical interventions improves when informed by basic research on human behavior, the efforts of mental health advocates will be advanced when they understand the psychological forces that affect policy makers' decisions about resources.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 507
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Altemeyer B., 1988, Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism
[2]  
Altemeyer B., 1996, AUTHORITARIAN SPECTE
[3]  
[Anonymous], GEN SOCIAL SURVEYS 1
[4]   Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice [J].
Bond, GR ;
Becker, DR ;
Drake, RE ;
Rapp, CA ;
Meisler, N ;
Lehman, AF ;
Bell, MD ;
Blyler, CR .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (03) :313-322
[5]  
Boyarsky BK, 2002, PSYCHIATR SERV, V53, P707
[6]   SENTENCING GOALS, CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS, IDEOLOGY, AND PERSONALITY [J].
CARROLL, JS ;
PERKOWITZ, WT ;
LURIGIO, AJ ;
WEAVER, FM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (01) :107-118
[7]  
Corrigan Patrick., 2001, Don't Call Me Nuts: Coping With The Stigma of Mental Illness
[8]   Three strategies for changing attributions about severe mental illness [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
River, LP ;
Lundin, RK ;
Penn, DL ;
Uphoff-Wasowski, K ;
Campion, J ;
Mathisen, J ;
Gagnon, C ;
Bergman, M ;
Goldstein, H ;
Kubiak, MA .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (02) :187-195
[9]   Strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to staff who treat people with serious mental illness [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
Steiner, L ;
McCracken, SG ;
Blaser, B ;
Barr, M .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (12) :1598-1606
[10]   Challenging two mental illness stigmas: Personal responsibility and dangerousness [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
Rowan, D ;
Green, A ;
Lundin, R ;
River, P ;
Uphoff-Wasowski, K ;
White, K ;
Kubiak, MA .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (02) :293-309