Varenicline: A First-Line Treatment Option for Smoking Cessation

被引:96
作者
Garrison, Gina Daubney [1 ]
Dugan, Sara E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Albany Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Albany, NY 12208 USA
关键词
varenicline; smoking cessation; nicotinic-receptor agonist; tobacco; RECEPTOR PARTIAL AGONIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SUSTAINED-RELEASE BUPROPION; LONG-TERM SAFETY; IN-VITRO; DOSE PHARMACOKINETICS; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; HEALTHY SMOKERS; FOLLOW-UP; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.021
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Varenicline acts as a partial agonist/antagonist with affinity and selectivity for alpha(4) beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. This activity at the nicotine-receptor level may help patients achieve smoking cessation by reducing cravings/withdrawal symptoms and smoking satisfaction. Objective: This article reviews the literature on the pharmacologic properties, therapeutic efficacy, and tolerability of varenicline for smoking cessation. Methods: Pertinent controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, meeting abstracts, case reports, and review articles published in English between 1966 and May 2008 were identified through searches of MEDLINE and OVID using the terms varenicline, smoking, tobacco cessation, and CP 526555. Results: Eight clinical trials were identified that compared :<= 12 weeks of varenicline treatment with placebo and/or bupropion sustained release (SR); one of the trials reported follow-up data to 24 weeks, and the remainder reported data to 52 weeks. During treatment with oral varenicline titrated to 1 mg BID, CO-confirmed 4-week continuous quit rates/continuous abstinence rates (CQRs/CARs) in weeks 9 through 12 ranged from 43.9% (odds ratio [OR] = 3.85 [95% CI, 2.69-5.50; P < 0.001 vs placebo]; OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.38-2.62; P < 0.001 vs bupropion SR]) to 65.4% (OR = 2.98 [95% CI, 1.78-4.99; P < 0.001 vs placebo]). In 4 of these trials, varenicline 1. mg BID was associated with significantly higher CQRs/CARs compared with placebo at week-52 follow-up, ranging from 21.9% (P < 0.001) to 34.6% (P = 0.036). One trial reported a significantly higher CAR at 52 weeks with varenichne compared with bupropion SR (23.0% vs 14.6%, respectively; P = 0.004), and another reported a significantly higher CAR at 52 weeks with varenicline compared with nicotine replacement therapy (25.9% vs 19.8%, respectively; P = 0.040). In a relapse-prevention study that included a 12-week extension period for participants who were abstinent after the initial 12 weeks of treatment, CARs were significantly improved at 24 weeks with varenicline relative to placebo (70.5% vs 49.6%, respectively; OR = 2.48; 95 % CI, 1.95-3.1.6; P < 0.001). Treatment with varenicline was generally well tolerated in study populations with no major comorbidities. In a pooled analysis of 2 Phase III trials, the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) with varenicline, bupropion SR, and placebo were nausea (28.8%, 9.9%, and 9.1%, respectively), insomnia (14.2%, 21.5%, and 12.6%), and headache (14.2%, 11.1%, and 12.4%). In a pooled analysis of 2 identically designed Phase III trials, bupropion SR was associated with the highest overall rates of discontinuation due to all-cause AEs compared with varenicline and placebo (13.9%, 9.5%, and 8.2%, respectively) and due to AEs considered related to study drug (12.1%, 7.9%, and 6.4%). In double-blind clinical trials of varenicline, nausea was the most frequently reported AE (16.3%-41.9%). Varenicline treatment should begin 7 days before the proposed smoking quit date; dose titration is recommended to minimize dose-related nausea. Based on postmarketing reports of serious AEs in varenicline-treated patients, caution is recommended when operating vehicles or heavy machinery. Patient education and monitoring for potential AEs are also recommended, particularly in patients with a history of psychiatric illness. Conclusions: Varenicline has a unique mechanism of action compared with other first-line options for smoking cessation. Available clinical-trial data support its use as an effective and generally well-tolerated therapy for smoking cessation in healthy adult smokers, although there is a need for further efficacy and safety evaluation in the general population, particularly those with comorbid conditions. (Clin Ther. 2009;31:463-491.) (C) 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 491
页数:29
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Adhikari B., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P1226
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CHANT PACK INS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, A Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Immune Response in Adults Allergic to Peanut After Receiving Intradermal or Intramuscular Administration of ASP0892 (ARA-LAMP-vax), a Single Multivalent Peanut (Ara h1, h2, h3) Lysosomal Associated Membrane Protein DNA Plasmid Vaccine
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[6]  
[Anonymous], ANT MED CHANT BANN
[7]   Recent advances in the treatment of tobacco dependence [J].
Anthenelli, RA .
CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (2-4) :175-183
[8]   Varenicline versus transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation: results from a randomised open-label trial [J].
Aubin, H-J ;
Bobak, A. ;
Britton, J. R. ;
Oncken, C. ;
Billing, C. B., Jr. ;
Gong, J. ;
Williams, K. E. ;
Reeves, K. R. .
THORAX, 2008, 63 (08) :717-724
[9]   Varenicline as compared to bupropion in smoking-cessation therapy -: Cost-utility results for Sweden 2003 [J].
Bolin, Kristian ;
Moerk, Ann-Christin ;
Willers, Stefan ;
Lindgren, Bjoern .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 102 (05) :699-710
[10]   Lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between a smoking cessation therapy, varenicline, and warfarin: An in vivo and in vitro study [J].
Burstein, Aaron H. ;
Clark, David J. ;
O'Gorman, Melissa ;
Willavize, Susan A. ;
Brayman, Timothy G. ;
Grover, G. Scott ;
Walsky, Robert L. ;
Obach, R. Scott ;
Faessel, Helene M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 47 (11) :1421-1429